SmartBar The Drovers Camp Camooweal
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Boss /worker..


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 6531
Date:
Boss /worker..


May be an image of text that says "Boss: What the hell are you watching? : A tutorial on how to effectively deal with coworkers. Boss: That's a kickboxing video. Me: Sure f* *cking is."



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 656
Date:

They won't need a kick boxing video when Payday Super kicks off on July 1.

That will be more than a kick in the guts to the many employers already struggling.

Sorry to put a "no joke" in the joke section !!!!
I love the billionaire joke preceding, it's a beauty.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 845
Date:

rmoor wrote:

They won't need a kick boxing video when Payday Super kicks off on July 1.

That will be more than a kick in the guts to the many employers already struggling.

Sorry to put a "no joke" in the joke section !!!!
I love the billionaire joke preceding, it's a beauty.


 So why do you think the employer is entitled not to promptly put the workers super into workers super account?  
The worker has done their part of the contract.  

Yeah, that is a joke. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 656
Date:

Because, the more pressure and costs and taxes placed on the employer, then many are not likely exist.

That then leaves the employee out on the street and the social security costs then skyrocket.
Which in turn raises the income tax on the existing workers lucky to still have a job to cover the exponential rise in dole payments.

Simples.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 845
Date:

rmoor wrote:

Because, the more pressure and costs and taxes placed on the employer, then many are not likely exist.

That then leaves the employee out on the street and the social security costs then skyrocket.
Which in turn raises the income tax on the existing workers lucky to still have a job to cover the exponential rise in dole payments.

Simples.


 Not so simple. Some companies have held superannuation and gone bust without any payment . Holding super payments disadvantages the funds of employees. 

Without a decent superannuation amount to provide for old age etc, that employee could be become a dependent on a pension provided by the government. Some ex-employees have super funds substantial enough that they do not have a government provided pension.  Funds for pensions are provided by taxes, so if more pensions are paid out more tax funds are required.  So would that not require more income tax?

Maybe the employer should get smarter with the business.  A few tax benefits they get eg vehicles, tools, rents etc etc .  
Sure business is hard but proper payment of superannuation is part of doing business just like power, fuel, rent etc etc . That is no joke, I understand.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 539
Date:

Its called cashflow. By the way, look at the boards of industry super funds and they are loaded with ex labor hacks.

__________________

Don't forget Matilda



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 845
Date:

Ineedabiggerboat wrote:

Its called cashflow. By the way, look at the boards of industry super funds and they are loaded with ex labor hacks.


 Most super funds are doing pretty well. No jokes. 
Cash flow? So businesses are happy not to get all of payments within three to six months? 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 7794
Date:

If every company has to pay the super Levi at X time on time, it is a level playing field for every company.

 

If anyone in our block of units doesn't pay their levy on time they are charged 10% interest rate. It encourages a level playing field as far as I understand it. 

 



__________________

Procrastination, mankind's greatest labour saving device!

50L custom fuel rack 6x20W 100/20mppt 4x26Ah gel 28L super insulated fridge TPMS 3 ARB compressors heatsink fan cooled 4L tank aftercooler Air/water OCD cleaning 4 stage car acoustic insulation.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1389
Date:

While I agree this substantially helps workers and reduces risk of losing if the company goes bust, but it is a huge impact on employers. Under the old system they had to do the reconcilation then submit the details four times a year. Now it is within 7 days of payday. If they pay weekly that is 52 times a year instead of 4. A lot of extra work.

On top of that, the penalties for being even a day late (funds actually in the employee super account) are way over the top. 60% of any missed amount is the default. With such tight deadlines and such heavy penalties the likelihood of a strugglinng small business going bust as a result is notably greater .... the employees are out on the street as mentioned by rmoor.

So, sure, employees have less risk of losing super, but the cost to businesses is higher, with less working capital to cover the bad times, and the tight lodgement timeframe plus penalties may be enough for them to fail. No doubt some employers will move away from weekly/fortnightly paydays to help with this burden. Many employees won't like that.

Edit. Whoops, sorry. I just noted this the Jokes forum. 



-- Edited by Are We Lost on Thursday 21st of May 2026 06:13:49 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 755
Date:

Are We Lost wrote:

 

Edit. Whoops, sorry. I just noted this the Jokes forum. 



-- Edited by Are We Lost on Thursday 21st of May 2026 06:13:49 PM


 Yep and once again politics comes onto the forum in the Jokes section.

Fair dinkum no wonder people get pi**ed off.

Politics belong on forum where it doesn't get closed, some people just can't help themselves



__________________

Age does not weary us, makes us go travelling more

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook