Last year when I weighed our rig I reported the numbers here, and we all realised that I needed to give some serious thought to our weight situation. The very heavy ball weight on the Pajero with its softish rear end doesn't handle as well as it should.
I began by making a list of additions and the removal of the club lounge to the van. The first changes have been made by shifting the genset and box to rear bumber swapping the anti flap gear in a 150mm pvc tube to A frame. I had to move the bumper rearward a few centimeters to achieve the result.
As I was working along doing this and the solenoid water tank changing project I had a much closer look under the van. I can't believe where the water tanks have been placed with this floor plan, and WORSE than that the chassis cross member spacing won't allow them to be shifted!!!!! They have reversed one of the two tank mounting cross members to allow the standard water tank to fit, approx. 410mm spacing. The rest are approx. 380mm. So, just can't shift the tanks into another space. Not happy as I am very limited to the amount of physical work I can do.
Be very careful about putting too much weight to the rear of your van. This will make it unstable. I can see that you are trying to reduce the ball load on the drawbar, but the effect of shunting it to the rear of the van could make it tailwag easily. Many years ago, I did a lap of the block with a Magna and a camper trailer. I had a bike rack on the rear of the trailer, and I mounted 2 x 20 L cans for water on the bar. I initially filled them and took off, but the rig was decidedly tail heavy, so it was only when I was getting into unknown and dry territory when I filled the cans. As soon as possible, I emptied then because it was a very twitchy rig when they were full.
Be very careful about putting too much weight to the rear of your van. This will make it unstable. I can see that you are trying to reduce the ball load on the drawbar, but the effect of shunting it to the rear of the van could make it tailwag easily. Many years ago, I did a lap of the block with a Magna and a camper trailer. I had a bike rack on the rear of the trailer, and I mounted 2 x 20 L cans for water on the bar. I initially filled them and took off, but the rig was decidedly tail heavy, so it was only when I was getting into unknown and dry territory when I filled the cans. As soon as possible, I emptied then because it was a very twitchy rig when they were full.
Thanks erad. Being a farm boy I was very familiar with heavy vehicles and towing heavy loads, and fully appreciate what you are saying.
I admit I am not fully informed in the actual weights you have been trying to sort out (I guess I should have taken more notice when you had talked about these weight issues previously) ... or the exact model Pajero you have or the ATM of your van.
However, I will assume you are aware of these weights and restrictions below -
Are you restricted to the TBM of 180Kg due to the van exceeding 2,500Kg ATM? or is it that you have a TBM greater than 250Kg even though the van is below 2,500Kg ATM?
If the van's ATM (indeed actual weight) is 2,500Kg+ I would be very wary in moving any weight further rearward as that is a very low TBM (180Kg) for that sort of ATM.
Cheers - John
__________________
2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan
Thanks John, getting a bit late for me and am pretty knocked about due to the heat and humidity we have been having. I will put more info up tomorrow. We had the van and car loaded up a lot so as to get a real life reading.
The van weight whilst connected to Pajero with WDH fitted was 2700kg, the car was 2900kg, and the ball weight was 320kg.
Thinking laterally, since you are within the legal towing mass just wondering if the Mitsubishi TBM spec may be eligible for re-rating (engineers certificate) if the Paj. rear susp was modified to cope with a weight closer to 10% of your ATM? Not sure, it's just a thought!
__________________
Cheers,
Tony
"Opinion is the medium between ignorance and knowledge" - Plato
Hi Aussie Paul , I posted an article the other day to do with TBW , the guts of it was that for example if your vehicle has a TBW limit of 250 kg and an overhang of 1500mm and you fit a WDH to your rig then the TBW limit is actually lowered as a result because the overhang is increased in length , in the post there was a calculation that configured the difference . this is the calculation Stated Vehicle TBO, divided by the actual TBO x the tow ball weight = recalculated ball weight. So if your TBW is 250 to start with and your using a WDH then it is actually lower than what you thought to start with .
Thanks John, getting a bit late for me and am pretty knocked about due to the heat and humidity we have been having. I will put more info up tomorrow. We had the van and car loaded up a lot so as to get a real life reading.
The van weight whilst connected to Pajero with WDH fitted was 2700kg, the car was 2900kg, and the ball weight was 320kg.
Aussie Paul.
Gday...
If I am reading the info wrongly, someone please correct me ........ but, I think you have a genuine dilemma Paul.
Given the ATM of your van at 2,700Kg and the manufacturer's specs for towing, the Pajero is limited to a TBM of 180Kg at that ATM. With the TBM currently at 320Kg, I would think you have a snowball's chance in hell to reduce the TBM to 180Kg (or less).
Again, if I am incorrect would someone please correct me ... but it is not just "getting 140Kg off the tow ball" but needing to relocate considerably more weight around (to the rear of?) the van to attain that TBM.
Even if you were successful by "relocating weight" you will not have actually 'reduced' the ATM of the van.
From my limited knowledge I would say, to get the situation 'compliant' means the van has the potential to become quite unstable to tow. A van with 2,700Kg ATM, with (if you get there) 180Kg on the ball and now a more rearward weight (even if it could be 'centrally' placed) is heading toward potential instability.
I really do hesitate to say this ... but to my thinking, I would either be changing the tow vehicle to one more suited to towing that van ... or looking for another van with a lower ATM and/or TBM.
Cheers - John
__________________
2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan
Oh dear, not what Paul wants to hear, but probably the best solution. Just looking at your compliance plate, the empty van ball weight was 145kg, the ball weight has increased dramaticly, just wondering how heavy those chairs you put in are, the chairs fitted to our van are very light, too light.
What I am concerned about, is what are you going to do when all these projects are solved?
Paul, I have done a bit of a search and found your original post regarding your "weight dilemma" from August last year. I remember it and I guess I should have read it more carefully then.
Others did and provided advice ... general consensus was you had a very big problem to try to resolve.
You provided the jottings from your exercise over the scales -
How did you determine the TBM from these figures?
You provided a copy of the vehicle's specs -
I assume the jottings on the 'weighing exercise' show the weights at 2015 on the left? If so, then you must have realised there was a considerable problem back then as you show a TBM of 280Kg (How did you arrive at that figure?) which was already 30Kg over the amount to be compliant. I assume the weights in 2015 (?) were before any loading for any trip?
Given the manufacturer's stipulated compliance weights, you are very unlikely to modify/re-arrange this van to be even close to a 180Kg TBM. Rather than trying to relocate weight to achieve the TBM of 180Kg, I would be removing weight to get the ATM (over the scales) below 2,500Kg - IE back to the weight it was in 2015 - which is quite probably removing everything you have added or intend to carry.
Having now taken the time (which I should have back in August 2017) I think I can only offer the very much unwanted advice again -
"I really do hesitate to say this ... but to my thinking, I would either be changing the tow vehicle to one more suited to towing that van ... or looking for another van with a lower ATM and/or TBM."
Cheers - John
__________________
2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan
Thanks John, getting a bit late for me and am pretty knocked about due to the heat and humidity we have been having. I will put more info up tomorrow. We had the van and car loaded up a lot so as to get a real life reading.
The van weight whilst connected to Pajero with WDH fitted was 2700kg, the car was 2900kg, and the ball weight was 320kg.
Aussie Paul.
Gday...
If I am reading the info wrongly, someone please correct me ........ but, I think you have a genuine dilemma Paul.
Given the ATM of your van at 2,700Kg and the manufacturer's specs for towing, the Pajero is limited to a TBM of 180Kg at that ATM. With the TBM currently at 320Kg, I would think you have a snowball's chance in hell to reduce the TBM to 180Kg (or less).
Again, if I am incorrect would someone please correct me ... but it is not just "getting 140Kg off the tow ball" but needing to relocate considerably more weight around (to the rear of?) the van to attain that TBM.
Even if you were successful by "relocating weight" you will not have actually 'reduced' the ATM of the van.
From my limited knowledge I would say, to get the situation 'compliant' means the van has the potential to become quite unstable to tow. A van with 2,700Kg ATM, with (if you get there) 180Kg on the ball and now a more rearward weight (even if it could be 'centrally' placed) is heading toward potential instability.
I really do hesitate to say this ... but to my thinking, I would either be changing the tow vehicle to one more suited to towing that van ... or looking for another van with a lower ATM and/or TBM.
Cheers - John
Hi John...Good post,but it is worth pointing out that Pauls problem is even worse
than it appears,using his own figures.If the van weight is 2700kg while it is on the car,
that is its GTM,NOT its ATM.....ATM is made up of GTM (2700kg) plus TBM (320kg)
so ATM is actually 3020kg....WAY too much for the desired,and probably unattainable,
180kg TBM.I suspect that this combination could thus fall into the ridiculously unstable
category,and it seems that the only solution is your suggestion.New tow vehicle or
lighter van.....sad,inconvenient truth.I wish Paul only goid luck with getting this sorted.
Cheers
-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:29:00 AM
-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:30:11 AM
-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:31:05 AM
-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:33:25 AM
Unfortunately Mitsubishi Pajero have a very unrealistic ball rating at 250kg up to 2500kg towing and only 180kg above that.
I have not seen the actual ATM rating of your Jayco posted but in your notes your axle group rating was stated at 2900kg so I guess it's at or below that figure.
Ideally your measured ball weight should be around 10% of ATM which in your case would be around 290kg (or less depending on ATM rating).
Paul, I think the bottom line is Mitsubishi do not want you to tow more than 2500kg with the Pajero..
Probably not what you want to hear, but maybe you should look at a more suitable tow vehicle.
Thanks everyone. We certainly have some problems. I had no idea about this sort of stuff when we bought the van.
We were lucky that we got a floor plan that suited our needs. Not sure why we bought the Pajero, they seemed to have a reasonable record from friends, relatives etc. The first time I "roughly" weighed it there appeared not to be a major problem. Mistake!!!
When I added the 200 watt solar panel I mounted it as far back as possible, and took the anti flap gear from under the bed and put on rear bumper.
After reading the weight problems on the forum, since that time, I decided I had better get serious about weighing.
So, there begins the saga.
Decision time now to work out we continue with our caravan journey, if so, change van or tug or both. With all the work I have done on the van am reluctant to change the van. Haven't spent any unneccessary dollars on the Pajero, so maybe time to look at tugs, but dollars are tight. Had hoped our rig would have lasted quite a while.
Thanks everyone. We certainly have some problems. I had no idea about this sort of stuff when we bought the van.
We were lucky that we got a floor plan that suited our needs. Not sure why we bought the Pajero, they seemed to have a reasonable record from friends, relatives etc. The first time I "roughly" weighed it there appeared not to be a major problem. Mistake!!!
When I added the 200 watt solar panel I mounted it as far back as possible, and took the anti flap gear from under the bed and put on rear bumper.
After reading the weight problems on the forum, since that time, I decided I had better get serious about weighing.
So, there begins the saga.
Decision time now to work out we continue with our caravan journey, if so, change van or tug or both. With all the work I have done on the van am reluctant to change the van. Haven't spent any unneccessary dollars on the Pajero, so maybe time to look at tugs, but dollars are tight. Had hoped our rig would have lasted quite a while.
Aussie Paul.
Hi Paul.....it certainly is not a good situation that you find yourself in,but on the positive side,
your car seems to be worth $25-$30k,dependent on mileage. For that price you can probably
get something like a 3.2 litre Ford Ranger or similar that is of similar vintage to the Pajero.Just beware......
the 3 litre Patrol is no go if it is Automatic,as it is then limited to only 2500kg towing capacity.The manual
version is good for 3000kg,I believe. Another option is an older model 4.2 litre Diesel Patrol.....
I am no fan of Nissans,but that 4.2 litre engine seems to go forever?
Anything seems preferable to getting rid of the van that you have tailored to your needs.......
and remember that lifes too short to just give up and end your caravan journey!
I wish you only the best in your efforts to find a solution to your problems.......
Hi Paul.....it certainly is not a good situation that you find yourself in,but on the positive side,
your car seems to be worth $25-$30k,dependent on mileage. For that price you can probably
get something like a 3.2 litre Ford Ranger or similar that is of similar vintage to the Pajero.Just beware......
the 3 litre Patrol is no go if it is Automatic,as it is then limited to only 2500kg towing capacity.The manual
version is good for 3000kg,I believe. Another option is an older model 4.2 litre Diesel Patrol.....
I am no fan of Nissans,but that 4.2 litre engine seems to go forever?
Anything seems preferable to getting rid of the van that you have tailored to your needs.......
and remember that lifes too short to just give up and end your caravan journey!
I wish you only the best in your efforts to find a solution to your problems.......
Cheers
Thanks Chris, I use WDH BUT I have found the towing stability reducing since I have been getting heavier on the ball weight.
Last trip I had the rear water tank full and the front one empty. Certainly better. People have said the Pajero rear end is too soft, so rather than spending dollars and still struggling with weights maybe go to twin cab with canopy to house heavier stuff like gensets etc.
I have always said that I reckon 80% of van combo are over weight somewhere, ball weight, axle group, gross etc, I know it would not be the good people on this forum or other forums to do with vans, but all them other uneducated people out there
cheers
blaze
Hi Paul.....it certainly is not a good situation that you find yourself in,but on the positive side,
your car seems to be worth $25-$30k,dependent on mileage. For that price you can probably
get something like a 3.2 litre Ford Ranger or similar that is of similar vintage to the Pajero.Just beware......
the 3 litre Patrol is no go if it is Automatic,as it is then limited to only 2500kg towing capacity.The manual
version is good for 3000kg,I believe. Another option is an older model 4.2 litre Diesel Patrol.....
I am no fan of Nissans,but that 4.2 litre engine seems to go forever?
Anything seems preferable to getting rid of the van that you have tailored to your needs.......
and remember that lifes too short to just give up and end your caravan journey!
I wish you only the best in your efforts to find a solution to your problems.......
Cheers
Thanks Chris, I use WDH BUT I have found the towing stability reducing since I have been getting heavier on the ball weight.
Last trip I had the rear water tank full and the front one empty. Certainly better. People have said the Pajero rear end is too soft, so rather than spending dollars and still struggling with weights maybe go to twin cab with canopy to house heavier stuff like gensets etc.
Aussie Paul.
Hi Paul...Twin cab with canopy will probably be your best bet.Remember to load the ute to its GVM,thus.
minimising the weight in your van. With the van connected,weigh the front axle on the car,then the whole car.
Deduct the front axle weight from the total to get the weight on the rear axle,then drive the whole rig onto
the bridge to get GCM. Then drive forward until only the van is on the bridge.....this obviously gives your GTM,
or weight on the van wheels. Then unhook the van,making sure that the jockey wheel is on the bridge,to get
your TBM.The numbers wont add up,because of the leverage effect of the TBO (towball overhang),but if you
want to be doubly sure,you can separately weigh the rear axle of the car with no van attached.
The difference between the two rear axle readings obviously is the weight that is transferred to your rear axle.....
but it is NOT TBM.
As an aside,probably unwise trying to balance the van by filling the rear water tank and leaving the front
empty,as this would likely worsen any swaying you may have.Pajeros are probably OK for small vans,but they
are out of their depth with anything over 2500kg ATM,as you have learned the hard way.
Good luck with your search for a new tow vehicle.
Cheers
P.S Nice place is Ballarat.I used to drink at the Eureka Stockade Hotel.
-- Edited by yobarr on Wednesday 31st of January 2018 09:29:51 PM