check out the new remote control Jockey Wheel SmartBar Canegrowers rearview170 Cobb Grill Skid Row Recovery Gear Caravan Industry Association of Australia
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: How safe are the electrics in your RV?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4375
Date:
How safe are the electrics in your RV?


How safe are the electrics in your RV?

10 years ago, the 240V system on the OKA was given a full certificate of approval by a qualified electrician who specialised in RVs.
It comprised some power points fed by a PSW inverter and protected by a dedicated RCD.

This would be similar to virtually all RVs whenever the input is plugged into a generator or inverter.
It is an "isolated" system.

Well, after 10 years of constant use, I recently discovered that the RCD was in fact totally useless, despite tripping when pressing the test button.

I now have an RVD-EI (Residual Voltage Detection Unit) installed and am now getting the protection I always thought we had.
Thanks to Ian (Powerstream) for his service and advise.
http://www.safelec.com.au

Cheers,
Peter


__________________

OKA196, 4x4 'C' Class, DIY, self contained motorhome. 960W of solar, 400Ah of AGMs, 310L water, 280L fuel. https://www.oka4wd.com/forum/members-vehicles-public/569-oka196-xt-motorhome
 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5744
Date:

Peter_n_Margaret wrote:

How safe are the electrics in your RV?

10 years ago, the 240V system on the OKA was given a full certificate of approval by a qualified electrician who specialised in RVs.
It comprised some power points fed by a PSW inverter and protected by a dedicated RCD.

This would be similar to virtually all RVs whenever the input is plugged into a generator or inverter.
It is an "isolated" system.

Well, after 10 years of constant use, I recently discovered that the RCD was in fact totally useless, despite tripping when pressing the test button.

I now have an RVD-EI (Residual Voltage Detection Unit) installed and am now getting the protection I always thought we had.
Thanks to Ian (Powerstream) for his service and advise.
http://www.safelec.com.au

Cheers,
Peter

 Not knowing what you don't know can be a real problem Peter....

Aussie Paul. smile



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

Peter_n_Margaret wrote:

How safe are the electrics in your RV?

10 years ago, the 240V system on the OKA was given a full certificate of approval by a qualified electrician who specialised in RVs.
It comprised some power points fed by a PSW inverter and protected by a dedicated RCD.

This would be similar to virtually all RVs whenever the input is plugged into a generator or inverter.
It is an "isolated" system.

Well, after 10 years of constant use, I recently discovered that the RCD was in fact totally useless, despite tripping when pressing the test button.

I now have an RVD-EI (Residual Voltage Detection Unit) installed and am now getting the protection I always thought we had.
Thanks to Ian (Powerstream) for his service and advise.
http://www.safelec.com.au

Cheers,
Peter

 HI Peter

A good lesson for ALL

If you use a generator or inverter, even if permanently wired, have ALL the power outlets checked with a RCD tester to confirm you have the protection you think you have

Do not just get one outlet tested

Do not think because the RCD trips when the" test" button is pressed, that ALL is OK

The 'test button only confirms that the RCD mechanism  is operating

It does not confirm that wiring is ok /correct for the RCD to give protection

Then, IF there is a problem I would strongly suggest you get a " Safelec RVD" fitted

Something that I hope many will take notice  of  :)


I have been trying to get the message through for a loooong time

 

PeterQ

 



--



-- Edited by oldtrack123 on Sunday 21st of December 2014 11:28:06 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:

I was going to ask this on an earlier post, never got around to it.

If an RCD protects you when connected to mains, why doesn't it protect you when connected to a generator?

I would guess it has something to do with no wire to earth in the supply ?????

Cheers Pete



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

wasn_me wrote:

I was going to ask this on an earlier post, never got around to it.

If an RCD protects you when connected to mains, why doesn't it protect you when connected to a generator?

I would guess it has something to do with no wire to earth in the supply ?????

Cheers Pete


 HI Pete

A simple answer ,YES

.But  [as always biggrin] it is not as simple as just doing that IN the generator.

IF that is done it is compulsory for a RCD to be permanently fitted to the generator

It cannot be done in the van unless the generator is permanently wired in with the correct changeover switching

PeterQ



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 157
Date:

I am relatively new in the RV world, and bow to the wisdom of the great experienced campers in this forum who have taught me so much in such a short time. However, I do have a lifetime of experience in the electrical field which may not necessarily apply to vans, etc. My thoughts on RCDs in vans and MHs are just this. An RCD - in my day they were ELCBs (earth leakage circuit breakers) which detected a small imbalance between the current flowing to the appliance, etc. through the active conductor and the current flowing back to the source through the neutral conductor. The assumption was that a person may be providing a secondary path by contact with the active and earth (e.g. sticking a fork into the toaster with one hand while you are standing barefooted on the wet grass outside the van) - in other words, being electrocuted. This type of protection is possible only where the neutral and earth connections are at the same potential, i.e. connected together at the switchboard and the power station. In a situation where you have an inverter or genny supply, if you don't connect these to earth you cannot receive a shock unless you actually touch both the active and neutral conductors at the same time (and that's not easy to do) as the supply is now isolated from earth. I have wired my inverter circuit GPOs without an earth (active and neutral only).  I welcome any comments from anyone who may be able to correct me if I'm mistaken as to the wiring rules of RCD devices on inverter and genny circuits in van environments . I would also think that the SAA rules would regard the entire van as an appliance, since it is connected by a removable lead and not hard wired. Therefore it could be connected as an earthed - or a double insulated - appliance which requires no earth connection.



-- Edited by Stratman77 on Monday 22nd of December 2014 02:58:32 AM

__________________

Best regards,

Chris

Licensed Electrician, Electronics, Gaming & Computer Technician. Now retired and loving it!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:

I just watched the "how a RCD works" in Peter n Margrets link.

How many people are out there using generators, totally unaware they're not protected.

My previous post (back a page) 240 volt protection, was because my 1999 van has no protection device fitted. I am happy this topic has been raised again.

The thing now is to find an electrician who is knowledgeable enough to fit the correct protection device.

I use an inverter (not wired into the van) to charge laptop, run a box fan & bug zapper. I'm assuming I have no protection when using the inverter?????

Cheers Pete



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4375
Date:

Stratman77 wrote:

 I have wired my inverter circuit GPOs without an earth (active and neutral only). 


 I am not an electrician, but I am confident that you are not fully protected in that circumstance unless you have an RVD fitted.

Also, the rules do not consider the van as an appliance. It is  transportable structure which has quite different regulations.

 

Cheers,

Peter



__________________

OKA196, 4x4 'C' Class, DIY, self contained motorhome. 960W of solar, 400Ah of AGMs, 310L water, 280L fuel. https://www.oka4wd.com/forum/members-vehicles-public/569-oka196-xt-motorhome
 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

Stratman77 wrote:

I am relatively new in the RV world, and bow to the wisdom of the great experienced campers in this forum who have taught me so much in such a short time. However, I do have a lifetime of experience in the electrical field which may not necessarily apply to vans, etc.

[1]

My thoughts on RCDs in vans and MHs are just this. An RCD - in my day they were ELCBs (earth leakage circuit breakers) which detected a small imbalance between the current flowing to the appliance, etc. through the active conductor and the current flowing back to the source through the neutral conductor.

 

[2]

The assumption was that a person may be providing a secondary path by contact with the active and earth (e.g. sticking a fork into the toaster with one hand while you are standing barefooted on the wet grass outside the van) - in other words, being electrocuted.

[3]

This type of protection is possible only where the neutral and earth connections are at the same potential, i.e. connected together at the switchboard and the power station.

[4]

In a situation where you have an inverter or genny supply, if you don't connect these to earth you cannot receive a shock unless you actually touch both the active and neutral conductors at the same time (and that's not easy to do) as the supply is now isolated from earth.

[5] I have wired my inverter circuit GPOs without an earth (active and neutral only).  I welcome any comments from anyone who may be able to correct me if I'm mistaken as to the wiring rules of RCD devices on inverter and genny circuits in van environments .

[6]I would also think that the SAA rules would regard the entire van as an appliance, since it is connected by a removable lead and not hard wired. Therefore it could be connected as an earthed - or a double insulated - appliance which requires no earth connection.



-- Edited by Stratman77 on Monday 22nd of December 2014 02:58:32 AM


 

Hi

One at a timesmile

[1]

   The original ELCBs for commercial use ,worked on the same principle as today's RCDs

THey did measure out of balance currents, between neutral & active ,due to current leaking to earth

They did not measure the actual leakage current in the earth system

They did require ,at least, an EN system not necessarily a M.E.N

I worked for a company that was a very early supplier,as their electrical service man.

It was a different system to the ELCBs used by power companies which did measure ACTUAL earth current

[2]

Yes AND ANY similar circumstance where something becomes live [such as the frame of a van]

[3]

 They are not voltage based ,they are current, based but obviously there has to be a return path for the leakage current so a EN bond is required FOR RCDs [ but not for RVDs]

[4]

True

AS long as that "ISOLATED "supply remains FULLY isolated

It only needs needs an insulation failure/ leakage[around 6000 Ohms] or an earth fault ANYWHERE in the system to make the system potentially deadly.

Sadly that has occurred & severe shocks have occurred

Before ELCBs /RCDS safty paks were used in industry [essentualy a transformer with fully isolated winding]

I personaly was involved in investigating accidents/ shock sthat occurred using those 

.So I am well aware of the potential for for shocks when isolation is LOST

[5]

Sorry, but you do not have a NEUTRAL YOu can only have a NEUTRAL IF you have an EN link,

otherwise they are simply classed as two ACTIVES/lines

THe recommendation for safe operation of "ISOLATED" supplies is to only ever connect/plug in ONE class 1 device at ant time

THat minimizes the risks of shocks

Mulitpe class 2 devices can be used with a very high degree of safet fronm shocks to earth

 

[6] The Electrical Standards certainly do not consider a Van"TRANSPORTABLE STRUCTURE" etc as an appliance

I suggest you obtain a copy of AS /NZS 3001"Transportable  Structures & their site supplies

It is as supplement to AS/NZS3000

You will find that any hard wired [240V' ]generator or inverter shall have  a fully operational RCD

THat is usualy done via a change over switch

If you look at" isolated supplies"in AS/NZS 3000 you will see there are some difficulties in complying with 'Seperation requirements"

  if they are to ne maintained as ISOLATED supplies. 

 

HOW could a van ever be considered as an isolated appliance?

  It has it's own earthing system

It is a class 1 device

It SHALL be fitted with a 3pin plug

 

 It is usualy full of other class ONE devices

Nowif you are happy to believe that your set up with multiple outlets on the inverter will be realy safe.no

 

 

PeterQ



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

wasn_me wrote:

[1]now is to find an electrician who is knowledgeable enough to fit the correct protection device.

[2]I use an inverter (not wired into the van) to charge laptop, run a box fan & bug zapper. I'm assuming I have no protection when using the inverter?????

Cheers Pete


 Hi Pete

[1]

JUst make sure he tests at EVERY individual 240V outlet socket, that the RCD does trip

it will onlt take a few more minutes

Sadly, many just test  @ one

[2] Remember the safety recommendation smile

Multiple clas 2 which have two pin plugs are quite safe for shocks to" earth" 

But Never connect more than ONE Class 1 which always shall have a 3 pin plug

 

PeterQ



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 157
Date:

OK. It seems as though I must have slept through many of my electrical theory classes - or simply forgotten it. As I said, I was not suggesting my views were current regulations and was confident there would be many contributors who could set me straight. Having no experience with RVDs, I see that they do offer additional protection where an earth connection is unavailable or not used. However, they have to be used in conjunction with an RCD. What really disturbs me is that I get the impression from reading many posts that there is an expectation that these devices virtually eliminate the possibility of serious or fatal electric shock. This is a very dangerous fallacy. The devices will interrupt the current flow when the trigger perameters are reached, but there is no guarantee that the level of current flow for that - albeit very brief - period of time cannot cause serious injury or death. I think an annual insulation and electrical test certificate, along with appliance testing would be an excellent addition to the gas inspection. On the other points of dispute, I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I will certainly accept that the classification of vans is certainly covered by regulations unfamiliar to me and would not be regarded as a plug in appliance.  



__________________

Best regards,

Chris

Licensed Electrician, Electronics, Gaming & Computer Technician. Now retired and loving it!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9575
Date:

oldtrack123 wrote:
~~~SNIP [2] Remember the safety recommendation smile

Multiple clas 2 which have two pin plugs are quite safe for shocks to" earth" 

But Never connect more than ONE Class 1 which always shall have a 3 pin plug

 PeterQ


Gday...

Let me firstly state I am only a half a notch above moron when it comes to electricity. But because I do try to gain some understanding about this magical medium called 'tricity ... I constantly read and try to understand these threads in case I need to draw on this stuff from the deep, dark depths of my ageing mind. Even if only to 'recall' the jargon when some sparkie/auto elec is telling me 'his solution'.

I assume the HWS in a van (eg Suburban), absorption fridge (eg Dometic), washing machine and microwave are all "Class 1" appliances - that is they have a three pin plug attached -

Plug.gif

When the van is connected to 240V in a van park, the HWS and fridge are working 'all the time' and the microwave is used fairly regularly. The stove has a 240v hotplate which is also used regularly. The washing machine is also used at least twice a week while these other appliances are switched on and drawing power.

From a point of view of genuinely trying to understand 'safety in the van', when you say NEVER connect more than ONE Class 1 appliance does this apply to NOT having those appliances working at the same time?

Again, please keep it simple, and in layperson's terms - I really am only one notch above a moron regarding 'tricity.

Cheers - John

 



__________________

2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter
Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:

rockylizard wrote:
oldtrack123 wrote:
~~~SNIP [2] Remember the safety recommendation smile

Multiple clas 2 which have two pin plugs are quite safe for shocks to" earth" 

But Never connect more than ONE Class 1 which always shall have a 3 pin plug

 PeterQ


Gday...

Let me firstly state I am only a half a notch above moron when it comes to electricity. But because I do try to gain some understanding about this magical medium called 'tricity ... I constantly read and try to understand these threads in case I need to draw on this stuff from the deep, dark depths of my ageing mind. Even if only to 'recall' the jargon when some sparkie/auto elec is telling me 'his solution'.

I assume the HWS in a van (eg Suburban), absorption fridge (eg Dometic), washing machine and microwave are all "Class 1" appliances - that is they have a three pin plug attached -

Plug.gif

When the van is connected to 240V in a van park, the HWS and fridge are working 'all the time' and the microwave is used fairly regularly. The stove has a 240v hotplate which is also used regularly. The washing machine is also used at least twice a week while these other appliances are switched on and drawing power.

From a point of view of genuinely trying to understand 'safety in the van', when you say NEVER connect more than ONE Class 1 appliance does this apply to NOT having those appliances working at the same time?

Again, please keep it simple, and in layperson's terms - I really am only one notch above a moron regarding 'tricity.

Cheers - John

 


 Hi, I understood the reply from PeterQ was referring to using an inverter not wired through a protection device.

Cheers Pete



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

 

HI John

Sorry, perhaps I did not make it clear

THose comments were only relevant to the use  of so called "isolated"supplies/ souces. [generators & inverters]

THe sort that most RVers buy

Generators & inverters with NO, RCD ,RVD, earth leakage, protection

 Late model vans etc SHALL have RCD protection in the vans etc ie "Transportable structures"

But is inoperable with a generator or inverter plugged into the van inlet socket.

Good to see you asking quetions, if you do not understand keep askingsmile

PeterQ

 

 



-- Edited by oldtrack123 on Monday 22nd of December 2014 04:39:14 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9575
Date:

Gday...

Thanks Pete and PeterQ.

So if not connected to a 240V outlet at a van park but to a generator (or inverter) then the HWS, Fridge, Washing machine, Microwave, stove hotplate should not be used at the same time?

If using the generator I would only use it for battery charging, through the inbuilt 'smart charger/power supply' (which has a three-pin plug) provided in the van; the hotplate for about 20mins cooking tucker (and not that often ); and maybe the washing machine.

I therefore assume I would be considered "safe" .. or is that still too much to have coming 'connected' to the generator?

Cheers - John



__________________

2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter
Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

Stratman77 wrote:

OK. It seems as though I must have slept through many of my electrical theory classes - or simply forgotten it. As I said, I was not suggesting my views were current regulations and was confident there would be many contributors who could set me straight. Having no experience with RVDs, I see that they do offer additional protection where an earth connection is unavailable or not used.

[1]

However, they have to be used in conjunction with an RCD. What really disturbs me is that I get the impression from reading many posts that there is an expectation that these devices virtually eliminate the possibility of serious or fatal electric shock.

[2]

This is a very dangerous fallacy. The devices will interrupt the current flow when the trigger perameters are reached, but there is no guarantee that the level of current flow for that - albeit very brief - period of time cannot cause serious injury or death.

3]

I think an annual insulation and electrical test certificate, along with appliance testing would be an excellent addition to the gas inspection. On the other points of dispute, I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I will certainly accept that the classification of vans is certainly covered by regulations unfamiliar to me and would not be regarded as a plug in appliance.  


 

Hi

[1]

Yes, for most purpose they are used with a RCD but can be used on their own for low current applications

But they are more sensitive & they respond to voltage more than current

 THey use the RCD as the tripping mechanism

They are, IMHO , far superior to any other existing  form of protection from shocks to earth

One of the advantages is that the initial "'Isolation" remains a as a first line of protection

An EN bond is not necessary but they detect when one occurs or exists,

 

{2]ike all forms of detection, they cannot give protection from line to line or line to neutral shocks,

Like all such protection device,they have to pass very strict standards to ensure they reliably trip  At the approved current /time levels

 Nothing in live is foolproof,  but they do have a test button which performs an electrical test of the unit.

Some Gov depts consider them far superior to RCDs & are fitting ALL their ambulances with them. Where they HAD to use high sensitity,10mA tripping   RCDs.

[3] I am all for annual inspections & tests& such is required in NZ for very good reasons ,due to a few  differences in their approach to how vans may be wired

It would also catch up with dodgy work carried out by those who do not know/understand the apllicable standards.

But All that such an inspections indicates is that ALL WAS well @ the time of the test

AS the van drive out the door a potentially deadly fault can develop

The only way is to ensure safety is:

"[a] the van is wired fully in accordance with the Standards

Any alterations /Additions are carried out by an electrician who knows the Standards[many do not know they even exist!]

[c]Use the best avaialble  shock protection system

[d Then finally ,that rare commodity where electricity is concerned "COMMON SENSE"

 

PeterQ



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

rockylizard wrote:

Gday...

Thanks Pete and PeterQ.

[1]

So if not connected to a 240V outlet at a van park but to a generator (or inverter) then the HWS, Fridge, Washing machine, Microwave, stove hotplate should not be used at the same time?

[2]

If using the generator I would only use it for battery charging, through the inbuilt 'smart charger/power supply' (which has a three-pin plug) provided in the van; the hotplate for about 20mins cooking tucker (and not that often ); and maybe the washing machine.

[3]I therefore assume I would be considered "safe" .. or is that still too much to have coming 'connected' to the generator?

Cheers - John


 

Hi John

First, I should make the point  you will not be electrocuted just because you have more than one Class1 connected

It needs  2 faults for that to occur  The first one can exist without you knowing

The 2nd can be a person, who become the link result, BAM , shock  or electrocution

The more Class 1connected the greater the risk of one becoming fauity

[1] correct unless you have shock protection,[ best a" RVD"]

[2]THe battery charger IS the 2nd  class1 device

The van itself is the first ,no doubt you have a 240V fridge plugged in that is #3

 

It realy comes down to what risks YOU are prepared to take 

If you wish to do no more than minmize the risks, follow the  recommendations, the fewer class one PLUGGED in the better 

If you wish to feel realy safe, then do as you no doubt have at home, get Shock to earth protection.

 

With portable generators plugged into the van inlet socket THAT means a RVD/RCD combo

I am making a little prediction, within the next few years, ALL portable generator will have some such form of earth leakage  protection

It is now mandatory for

:ALL that are  any hired out

All used on mining, construction & building sites,

 

Why has that Reg been made ??

Simply because of  many shocks & some deaths!

PeterQ

 



-- Edited by oldtrack123 on Monday 22nd of December 2014 05:38:25 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 157
Date:

As I stated previously, there is much confusion regarding the provision of home standard protection in a van. See http://www.exploroz.com/Forum/Topic/107454/Electrical_safety.aspx for (a) very comprehensive post(s) on the subject. And once again I highlight the unrealistic expectation apparently held by some that these devices provide absolute protection against electric shock. It is a fact that there have been deaths where a 9v battery has been put on the tongue, so it doesn't require a very high current flow through the heart or brain to be serious. I came from a time where safety packs (isolation transformers) were a mandatory safety precaution in certain environments. Of course any of these devices - including RCDs and RVDs - can fail, dramatically increasing the risk of electrocution anyway. I am not suggesting not to use these devices, just be aware that there are always risks when using electricity - even when they ARE installed and used correctly.



__________________

Best regards,

Chris

Licensed Electrician, Electronics, Gaming & Computer Technician. Now retired and loving it!



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:

Hello

Its interesting to read some of the posts on this subject.

From memory, there will be a slight shock for up to 30mS (at full current) before the RCD trips. IF and only IF the person receiving the shock is in a bad state of health (eg. bad heart) and the path the current takes through the body will determine the outcome of that event.

In conclusion, RCDs and RVDs will protect life in the majority of cases, however there will be individuals in bad health who MAY suffer badly or become deceased. In the most cases these devices have saved lives and will continue to do so thank goodness.

Im not sure I agree with the definition of class one and class two appliances, I have seen many class two appliances with 3 pins (earth not connected) the correct definition is the square within square located on the appliance body (AS/NZS 3760:200?)) I believe they stopped producing 2 pins for double insulated devices as manufacturers had returns with the complaint that there were only 2 pins on the plug (conjecture).

Again this is an interesting thread, I wish you all the compliments of the season.

The Crocks



-- Edited by Crockie on Monday 22nd of December 2014 06:31:49 PM

__________________

(Phil C) Retired

12 years RAAF



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

 

HI Chris

re[ quote]As I stated previously, there is much confusion regarding the provision of home standard protection in a van. See http://www.exploroz.com/Forum/Topic/107454/Electrical_safety.aspx for (a) very comprehensive post(s)[ end quote] 

 

Yes, with some individuals not having a clue about  RVDs, how they operated ,Isolated supplies & their weaknesses,& limited knowledge even on RCDs

After all it is just another forum with views & counter views..

 There is absolutely NO REASON why you cannot have "'HOME?" standard protection in a "TRANSPORTABLE structure"

IF IT IS DONE RIGHT!! in all areas:

Such as Equipotential bonding to the frame of virtually ALL exposed metal.

RCD now mandatory, to give the same level of protection as those whose  homes  are RCD protected

If An inverter or generator is permanently wired in,it SHALL have full RCD protection as a minimum

That is the whole purpose of the Standards to ensure max possible safety within reason

There SHOULD be no confusion

Perhaps you could explain why you do not beleive "home" standard prptection is not possible 

 

THe RVD makes it EVEN MORE SAFER!!as it does not need a high quality[low impedance ]   Earth to operate [being voltage operated rather than current]

Again suggest you obtain a copy  AS/NZS 3001"Transportable Structures & their power supply"

Especially if you are doing  electrical work on YOUR van.

PeterQ

 



-- Edited by oldtrack123 on Monday 22nd of December 2014 06:57:50 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:


HI Crockie
Yes ,you are quite correct "some" Class2 may be fitted with a 3 pin plug, but it is not mandatory,& now rare if the plug was factory fitted

And yes the square with in a square is the symbol for "double insulation"

But ALL class 1 SHALL be fitted with 3 pin plugs,.

PeterQ

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

 Yes correct "some" Class2 may be fitted with a 3 pin plug, but it is not mandatory,& now rare if the plug was factory fitted

And yes the square with in a square is the symbol for "double insulation"

But ALL class 1 SHALL be fitted with 3 pin plugs,

I see a better reason for the 2pin version being removed from sale.to the public biggrin

PeterQ



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

Hi Chris
Regarding the link to" explore OZ'
Bantam is not an electrician & obviuosly has a lot to learn about RCD & RVDs

K& Ft [Frank }is an electrician with RCD experience [In hospitals]
Alan B is an electrical engineer,
oldtrack123 Is an old electrician with years of experience with RCDs
Servicing, fault finding why they were tripping etc when they FIRST came on to the Aus market way back in late 50s early 60s

Also was aware of the development of the RVD, before it came onto the market.[even before it was considered for RV use, but I could see it's advantages even then.if certain problems could be overcome
Those problems are now solved with the various models.

PeterQ



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4571
Date:

My advice is to have a Licenced Electrician inspect your RV, repair any defects, replace any defective components, and issue an Electrical Compliance Certificate as required by law.



__________________

Retired Airline Pilot and Electrician..

I'm not old, I've just been young a long time....Ken

Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:

Big Gorilla wrote:

My advice is to have a Licenced Electrician inspect your RV, repair any defects, replace any defective components, and issue an Electrical Compliance Certificate as required by law.


 As stated at the beginning of this post, you can have an electrical compliance certificate, issued if the van has an RCD. But an RCD will not protect you if supplying power from a generator.

My van has no protection other than circuit breakers, 1999 vintage. I have learnt from this topic, & will be having an RVD fitted.

Cheers Pete



-- Edited by wasn_me on Monday 22nd of December 2014 09:42:26 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2206
Date:

I have read this post like no other recently. Had to go back and re-read some.

PeterQ, a question for you please.

Is a suburban HWS (as an example only) classed as a Class 1 device when it is switched off electrically????

I was curious as to "active" ie ON or "passive" ie OFF states of the HWS.

Thanks In advance Baz



__________________

Why is it so? Professor Julius Sumner Miller, a profound influence on my life, who explained science to us on TV in the 60's.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 157
Date:

I am happy to concede again - as I did in my first post - that I am no expert in the area of current RV & van wiring regulations and appreciate the comments from the above contributors who obviously know a lot more about it than I ever will. I trust all the readers of this forum have gained an understanding of electrical safety issues regarding what should be done to minimise any risk and ensure that not only is the van wiring safe and compliant, but all appliances are also tested and used with due care. It is also clear that it is likely that your neighbourhood electrical contractor may not have the specialist knowledge required to issue a compliance certificate in relation to any wiring other than the mains power circuits, and finding one who does may be difficult. Perhaps this forum may be useful if anyone knows one they could recommend, that would be great.

__________________

Best regards,

Chris

Licensed Electrician, Electronics, Gaming & Computer Technician. Now retired and loving it!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

Baz421 wrote:

I have read this post like no other recently. Had to go back and re-read some.

PeterQ, a question for you please.

Is a suburban HWS (as an example only) classed as a Class 1 device when it is switched off electrically????

I was curious as to "active" ie ON or "passive" ie OFF states of the HWS.

Thanks In advance Baz


 

HI Baz

Ifit is switched "'OFF"" at a power point then it is effectively disconnected

But if switched 'OFF" at the unit itself[ Integrel switch} there is still a chance of insulation failure within the unit

That would apply to ANY class 1device

SWitched "OFF" AT THE POWER POINT/ OUTLET/SOCKET,  the class 1 device can be considered disconnectedsmile

Hope That helps 

 

PeterQ



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2206
Date:

oldtrack123 wrote:
Baz421 wrote:

I have read this post like no other recently. Had to go back and re-read some.

PeterQ, a question for you please.

Is a suburban HWS (as an example only) classed as a Class 1 device when it is switched off electrically????

I was curious as to "active" ie ON or "passive" ie OFF states of the HWS.

Thanks In advance Baz


 

HI Baz

Ifit is switched "'OFF"" at a power point then it is effectively disconnected

But if switched 'OFF" at the unit itself[ Integrel switch} there is still a chance of insulation failure within the unit

That would apply to ANY class 1device

SWitched "OFF" AT THE POWER POINT/ OUTLET/SOCKET,  the class 1 device can be considered disconnectedsmile

Hope That helps 

 

PeterQ


Hey thank Mate, seems I'm doing the right thing, bloody amazing how good luck comes your way sometimes and overrides ignorance eh,,lol. 



__________________

Why is it so? Professor Julius Sumner Miller, a profound influence on my life, who explained science to us on TV in the 60's.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 157
Date:

A purely academic response as PeterQ made a reference earlier that there can be no 'neutral' without an earth connection. I understand the concept of calling a connection at earth potential neutral (with respect to earth) which is logical. However, I also accept the concept where we adopt nomenclature to indicate that one source is at a potential difference from another. The idea of naming any two sources with a potential difference between them and where they are totally isolated from any other source as 'active' is illogical. In my opinion, it would be the same as marking both battery terminals 'positive'. But once again, I accept that things change and my ideas are probably very outdated - like me.

__________________

Best regards,

Chris

Licensed Electrician, Electronics, Gaming & Computer Technician. Now retired and loving it!

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook