check out the new remote control Jockey Wheel SmartBar Canegrowers rearview170 Cobb Grill Skid Row Recovery Gear Caravan Industry Association of Australia
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The weight situation..


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:
The weight situation..


Last year when I weighed our rig I reported the numbers here, and we all realised that I needed to give some serious thought to our weight situation. The very heavy ball weight on the Pajero with its softish rear end doesn't handle as well as it should.

I began by making a list of additions and the removal of the club lounge to the van. The first changes have been made by shifting the genset and box to rear bumber swapping the anti flap gear in a 150mm pvc tube to A frame. I had to move the bumper rearward a few centimeters to achieve the result.

As I was working along doing this and the solenoid water tank changing project I had a much closer look under the van. I can't believe where the water tanks have been placed with this floor plan, and WORSE than that the chassis cross member spacing won't allow them to be shifted!!!!! They have reversed one of the two tank mounting cross members to allow the standard water tank to fit, approx. 410mm spacing. The rest are approx. 380mm. So, just can't shift the tanks into another space. Not happy as I am very limited to the amount of physical work I can do.

Aussie Paul. smile

 



Attachments
__________________


Chief one feather

Status: Offline
Posts: 17339
Date:

Hi Paul,

I'm confused sorry. If you were trying to reduce the weight of the van and be under ATM, how does moving things solve that confuse

Be gentle with your reply please biggrin



__________________

Live Life On Your Terms

DOUG  Chief One Feather  (Losing feathers with age)

TUG.......2014 Holden LT Colorado Twin Cab Ute with Canopy

DEN....... 2014 "Chief" Arrow CV  (with some changes)

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 723
Date:

Be very careful about putting too much weight to the rear of your van. This will make it unstable. I can see that you are trying to reduce the ball load on the drawbar, but the effect of shunting it to the rear of the van could make it tailwag easily. Many years ago, I did a lap of the block with a Magna and a camper trailer. I had a bike rack on the rear of the trailer, and I mounted 2 x 20 L cans for water on the bar. I initially filled them and took off, but the rig was decidedly tail heavy, so it was only when I was getting into unknown and dry territory when I filled the cans. As soon as possible, I emptied then because it was a very twitchy rig when they were full.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:

Dougwe wrote:

Hi Paul,

I'm confused sorry. If you were trying to reduce the weight of the van and be under ATM, how does moving things solve that confuse

Be gentle with your reply please biggrin


 Doesn't take much does it Doug biggrin

Main exercise is to reduce the VERY overweight ball weight for a start.

Aussie Paul. smile



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:

erad wrote:

Be very careful about putting too much weight to the rear of your van. This will make it unstable. I can see that you are trying to reduce the ball load on the drawbar, but the effect of shunting it to the rear of the van could make it tailwag easily. Many years ago, I did a lap of the block with a Magna and a camper trailer. I had a bike rack on the rear of the trailer, and I mounted 2 x 20 L cans for water on the bar. I initially filled them and took off, but the rig was decidedly tail heavy, so it was only when I was getting into unknown and dry territory when I filled the cans. As soon as possible, I emptied then because it was a very twitchy rig when they were full.


Thanks erad. Being a farm boy I was very familiar with heavy vehicles and towing heavy loads, and fully appreciate what you are saying.

Aussie Paul. smile



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9575
Date:

Gday...

I admit I am not fully informed in the actual weights you have been trying to sort out (I guess I should have taken more notice when you had talked about these weight issues previously) ... or the exact model Pajero you have or the ATM of your van.

However, I will assume you are aware of these weights and restrictions below -

Pajero 03.jpg

Are you restricted to the TBM of 180Kg due to the van exceeding 2,500Kg ATM? or is it that you have a TBM greater than 250Kg even though the van is below 2,500Kg ATM?

If the van's ATM (indeed actual weight) is 2,500Kg+ I would be very wary in moving any weight further rearward as that is a very low TBM (180Kg) for that sort of ATM.

Cheers - John



__________________

2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter
Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:

Thanks John, getting a bit late for me and am pretty knocked about due to the heat and humidity we have been having. I will put more info up tomorrow. We had the van and car loaded up a lot so as to get a real life reading.

The van weight whilst connected to Pajero with WDH fitted was 2700kg, the car was 2900kg, and the ball weight was 320kg.

Aussie Paul. smile



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 754
Date:

Thinking laterally, since you are within the legal towing mass just wondering if the Mitsubishi TBM spec may be eligible for re-rating (engineers certificate) if the Paj. rear susp was modified to cope with a weight closer to 10% of your ATM? Not sure, it's just a thought!

__________________

Cheers,

Tony

"Opinion is the medium between ignorance and knowledge" - Plato  

 The moral: Focus on the Facts

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 480
Date:

Hi Aussie Paul , I posted an article the other day to do with TBW , the guts of it was that for example if your vehicle has a TBW limit of 250 kg and an overhang of 1500mm and  you fit a WDH to your rig then the TBW limit is actually lowered as a result because the overhang is increased in length , in the post there was a calculation that configured the difference . this is the calculation Stated Vehicle TBO, divided by the actual TBO x the tow ball weight = recalculated ball weight. So if your TBW is 250 to start with and your using a WDH then it is actually lower than what you thought to start with .



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9575
Date:

aussie_paul wrote:

Thanks John, getting a bit late for me and am pretty knocked about due to the heat and humidity we have been having. I will put more info up tomorrow. We had the van and car loaded up a lot so as to get a real life reading.

The van weight whilst connected to Pajero with WDH fitted was 2700kg, the car was 2900kg, and the ball weight was 320kg.

Aussie Paul. smile


 Gday...

If I am reading the info wrongly, someone please correct me ........ but, I think you have a genuine dilemma Paul.no

Given the ATM of your van at 2,700Kg and the manufacturer's specs for towing, the Pajero is limited to a TBM of 180Kg at that ATM. With the TBM currently at 320Kg, I would think you have a snowball's chance in hell to reduce the TBM to 180Kg (or less).

Again, if I am incorrect would someone please correct me ... but it is not just "getting 140Kg off the tow ball" but needing to relocate considerably more weight around (to the rear of?) the van to attain that TBM.

Even if you were successful by "relocating weight" you will not have actually 'reduced' the ATM of the van.

From my limited knowledge I would say, to get the situation 'compliant' means the van has the potential to become quite unstable to tow. A van with 2,700Kg ATM, with (if you get there) 180Kg on the ball and now a more rearward weight (even if it could be 'centrally' placed) is heading toward potential instability.

I really do hesitate to say this ... but to my thinking, I would either be changing the tow vehicle to one more suited to towing that van ... or looking for another van with a lower ATM and/or TBM.

Cheers - John

 



__________________

2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter
Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2923
Date:

Oh dear, not what Paul wants to hear, but probably the best solution. Just looking at your compliance plate, the empty van ball weight was 145kg, the ball weight has increased dramaticly, just wondering how heavy those chairs you put in are, the chairs fitted to our van are very light, too light.
What I am concerned about, is what are you going to do when all these projects are solved?


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9575
Date:

Gday...

Paul, I have done a bit of a search and found your original post regarding your "weight dilemma" from August last year. I remember it and I guess I should have read it more carefully then.

Others did and provided advice ... general consensus was you had a very big problem to try to resolve. 

You provided the jottings from your exercise over the scales -

Pajero Towing Weight 01.JPG

How did you determine the TBM from these figures? 

You provided a copy of the vehicle's specs -

Pajero GN 01.jpg

I assume the jottings on the 'weighing exercise' show the weights at 2015 on the left? If so, then you must have realised there was a considerable problem back then as you show a TBM of 280Kg (How did you arrive at that figure?) which was already 30Kg over the amount to be compliant. I assume the weights in 2015 (?) were before any loading for any trip?

Given the manufacturer's stipulated compliance weights, you are very unlikely to modify/re-arrange this van to be even close to a 180Kg TBM. Rather than trying to relocate weight to achieve the TBM of 180Kg, I would be removing weight to get the ATM (over the scales) below 2,500Kg - IE back to the weight it was in 2015 - which is quite probably removing everything you have added or intend to carry.

Having now taken the time (which I should have back in August 2017) I think I can only offer the very much unwanted advice again - 

"I really do hesitate to say this ... but to my thinking, I would either be changing the tow vehicle to one more suited to towing that van ... or looking for another van with a lower ATM and/or TBM."

Cheers - John



__________________

2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter
Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

rockylizard wrote:
aussie_paul wrote:

Thanks John, getting a bit late for me and am pretty knocked about due to the heat and humidity we have been having. I will put more info up tomorrow. We had the van and car loaded up a lot so as to get a real life reading.

The van weight whilst connected to Pajero with WDH fitted was 2700kg, the car was 2900kg, and the ball weight was 320kg.

Aussie Paul. smile


 Gday...

If I am reading the info wrongly, someone please correct me ........ but, I think you have a genuine dilemma Paul.no

Given the ATM of your van at 2,700Kg and the manufacturer's specs for towing, the Pajero is limited to a TBM of 180Kg at that ATM. With the TBM currently at 320Kg, I would think you have a snowball's chance in hell to reduce the TBM to 180Kg (or less).

Again, if I am incorrect would someone please correct me ... but it is not just "getting 140Kg off the tow ball" but needing to relocate considerably more weight around (to the rear of?) the van to attain that TBM.

Even if you were successful by "relocating weight" you will not have actually 'reduced' the ATM of the van.

From my limited knowledge I would say, to get the situation 'compliant' means the van has the potential to become quite unstable to tow. A van with 2,700Kg ATM, with (if you get there) 180Kg on the ball and now a more rearward weight (even if it could be 'centrally' placed) is heading toward potential instability.

I really do hesitate to say this ... but to my thinking, I would either be changing the tow vehicle to one more suited to towing that van ... or looking for another van with a lower ATM and/or TBM.

Cheers - John

Hi John...Good post,but it is worth pointing out that Pauls problem is even worse

than it appears,using his own figures.If the van weight is 2700kg while it is on the car,    

 that is its GTM,NOT its ATM.....ATM is made up of GTM (2700kg) plus TBM (320kg)  

 so ATM is actually 3020kg....WAY too much for the desired,and probably unattainable,  

 180kg TBM.I suspect that this combination could thus fall into the ridiculously unstable     

 category,and it seems that the only solution is your suggestion.New tow vehicle or  

lighter van.....sad,inconvenient truth.I wish Paul only goid luck with getting this sorted.      

                                                                                                                                  Cheers         

 

  

 

 

 


 



-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:29:00 AM



-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:30:11 AM



-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:31:05 AM



-- Edited by yobarr on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 11:33:25 AM

__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1024
Date:

Aussie Paul, sent you a PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:

PeterInSa wrote:

Aussie Paul, sent you a PM


 I see that, thanks Peter.

Aussie Paul. smile



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1077
Date:

Paul,

Unfortunately Mitsubishi Pajero have a very unrealistic ball rating at 250kg up to 2500kg towing and only 180kg above that.
I have not seen the actual ATM rating of your Jayco posted but in your notes your axle group rating was stated at 2900kg so I guess it's at or below that figure.
Ideally your measured ball weight should be around 10% of ATM which in your case would be around 290kg (or less depending on ATM rating).

Paul, I think the bottom line is Mitsubishi do not want you to tow more than 2500kg with the Pajero..
Probably not what you want to hear, but maybe you should look at a more suitable tow vehicle.

__________________

Monty. RV Dealer.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2061
Date:

Could it be that the 180kg is a typo and should read 280kg on the ball?
180kg makes no sense at all.

__________________

Sta



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 203
Date:

Goodday OldBloke,

The information supplied by Montie in his post re the 180kg ball load limit over a 2500kg towing is correct.

Cheers AL


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

sandgrooper1 wrote:

Goodday OldBloke,

The information supplied by Montie in his post re the 180kg ball load limit over a 2500kg towing is correct.

Cheers AL


 Second that......and there are so many people who have not done any research,are overloaded

to the point of stupidity,and believe that  it somehow is the fault of somebody else.

Towing with a Pajero is like sending a boy to do a mans job!

 



__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2061
Date:

No expert here but that is counter to all logic.
Are we all just assuming the manual is correct? Or has it been checked elsewhere?


__________________

Sta



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9575
Date:

Gday...

Here ya go oldbloke ... from the horse's mouth.....

https://www.mitsubishi-motors.com.au/vehicles/pajero/specifications

 Pajero Spec 01.JPG

Cheers - John



__________________

2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter
Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:

This is taken from my Pajero manual.

Aussie Paul. smile

b.JPGaa.jpg

 



-- Edited by aussie_paul on Tuesday 30th of January 2018 09:39:32 PM

Attachments
__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

aussie_paul wrote:

This is taken from my Pajero manual.

Aussie Paul. smile

 


 Hi Paul....Unfortunately for you,there it is in black and white. 250kg max ball weight up to 2500 ATM,

but only 180kg from 2500kg to 3000kg towable mass.

                                                           Cheers.



__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:

Thanks everyone. We certainly have some problems. I had no idea about this sort of stuff when we bought the van.no

We were lucky that we got a floor plan that suited our needs. Not sure why we bought the Pajero, they seemed to have a reasonable record from friends, relatives etc. The first time I "roughly" weighed it there appeared not to be a major problem. Mistake!!!

Van weights with Pajero and somewhat loaded..jpg

When I added the 200 watt solar panel I mounted it as far back as possible, and took the anti flap gear from under the bed and put on rear bumper.thumbsup.gif

After reading the weight problems on the forum, since that time, I decided I had better get serious about weighing.

So, there begins the saga.biggrin

Decision time now to work out we continue with our caravan journey, if so, change van or tug or both. With all the work I have done on the van am reluctant to change the van. Haven't spent any unneccessary dollars on the Pajero, so maybe time to look at tugs, but dollars are tight. Had hoped our rig would have lasted quite a while. hmm.gif

Aussie Paul.smile

 

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

aussie_paul wrote:

Thanks everyone. We certainly have some problems. I had no idea about this sort of stuff when we bought the van.no

We were lucky that we got a floor plan that suited our needs. Not sure why we bought the Pajero, they seemed to have a reasonable record from friends, relatives etc. The first time I "roughly" weighed it there appeared not to be a major problem. Mistake!!!

Van weights with Pajero and somewhat loaded..jpg

When I added the 200 watt solar panel I mounted it as far back as possible, and took the anti flap gear from under the bed and put on rear bumper.thumbsup.gif

After reading the weight problems on the forum, since that time, I decided I had better get serious about weighing.

So, there begins the saga.biggrin

Decision time now to work out we continue with our caravan journey, if so, change van or tug or both. With all the work I have done on the van am reluctant to change the van. Haven't spent any unneccessary dollars on the Pajero, so maybe time to look at tugs, but dollars are tight. Had hoped our rig would have lasted quite a while. hmm.gif

Aussie Paul.smile

 

 


 Hi Paul.....it certainly is not a good situation that you find yourself in,but on the positive side,                                            

your car seems to be worth $25-$30k,dependent on mileage. For that price you can probably

get something like a 3.2 litre Ford Ranger or similar that is of similar vintage to the Pajero.Just beware......

the 3 litre Patrol is no go if it is Automatic,as it is then limited to only 2500kg towing capacity.The manual

version is good for 3000kg,I believe. Another option is an older model 4.2 litre Diesel Patrol.....

I am no fan of Nissans,but that 4.2 litre engine seems to go forever? 

Anything seems preferable to getting rid of the van that you have tailored to your needs.......

and remember that lifes too short to just give up and end your caravan journey!

I wish you only the best in your efforts to  find a solution to your problems.......   

                                                                                               Cheers

 



__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2339
Date:

bugger
Just delete all this post paul and carry on (insert smilely here and a couple more buggers
cheers
blaaze

__________________
http://blaze-therese.blogspot.com/


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5723
Date:

yobarr wrote:

 Hi Paul.....it certainly is not a good situation that you find yourself in,but on the positive side,                                            

your car seems to be worth $25-$30k,dependent on mileage. For that price you can probably

get something like a 3.2 litre Ford Ranger or similar that is of similar vintage to the Pajero.Just beware......

the 3 litre Patrol is no go if it is Automatic,as it is then limited to only 2500kg towing capacity.The manual

version is good for 3000kg,I believe. Another option is an older model 4.2 litre Diesel Patrol.....

I am no fan of Nissans,but that 4.2 litre engine seems to go forever? 

Anything seems preferable to getting rid of the van that you have tailored to your needs.......

and remember that lifes too short to just give up and end your caravan journey!

I wish you only the best in your efforts to  find a solution to your problems.......   

                                                                                               Cheers

 


Thanks Chris, I use WDH BUT I have found the towing stability reducing since I have been getting heavier on the ball weight.

Last trip I had the rear water tank full and the front one empty. Certainly better. People have said the Pajero rear end is too soft, so rather than spending dollars and still struggling with weights maybe go to twin cab with canopy to house heavier stuff like gensets etc.

Aussie Paul. smile



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

 

blaze wrote:

bugger
Just delete all this post paul and carry on (insert smilely here and a couple more buggers
cheers
blaaze


 Thanks Robert...What a well thought out,and responsible piece of advice. And when Paul has an accident,

and finds that the insurance company has declined his claim on the basis that the vehicle was not set up legally,    

will your advice still be BUGGER?

                                           Cheers.

                       

                                                                      



__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2339
Date:

I have always said that I reckon 80% of van combo are over weight somewhere, ball weight, axle group, gross etc, I know it would not be the good people on this forum or other forums to do with vans, but all them other uneducated people out there
cheers
blaze

__________________
http://blaze-therese.blogspot.com/


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

aussie_paul wrote:
yobarr wrote:

 Hi Paul.....it certainly is not a good situation that you find yourself in,but on the positive side,                                            

your car seems to be worth $25-$30k,dependent on mileage. For that price you can probably

get something like a 3.2 litre Ford Ranger or similar that is of similar vintage to the Pajero.Just beware......

the 3 litre Patrol is no go if it is Automatic,as it is then limited to only 2500kg towing capacity.The manual

version is good for 3000kg,I believe. Another option is an older model 4.2 litre Diesel Patrol.....

I am no fan of Nissans,but that 4.2 litre engine seems to go forever? 

Anything seems preferable to getting rid of the van that you have tailored to your needs.......

and remember that lifes too short to just give up and end your caravan journey!

I wish you only the best in your efforts to  find a solution to your problems.......   

                                                                                               Cheers

 


Thanks Chris, I use WDH BUT I have found the towing stability reducing since I have been getting heavier on the ball weight.

Last trip I had the rear water tank full and the front one empty. Certainly better. People have said the Pajero rear end is too soft, so rather than spending dollars and still struggling with weights maybe go to twin cab with canopy to house heavier stuff like gensets etc.

Aussie Paul. smile


 Hi Paul...Twin cab with canopy will probably be your best bet.Remember to load the ute to its GVM,thus.    

minimising the weight in your van. With the van connected,weigh the front axle on the car,then the whole car.

Deduct the front axle weight from the total to get the weight on the rear axle,then drive the whole rig onto

the bridge to get GCM. Then drive forward until only the van is on the bridge.....this obviously gives your GTM,

or weight on the van wheels. Then unhook the van,making sure that the jockey wheel is on the bridge,to get

your TBM.The numbers wont add up,because of the leverage effect of the TBO (towball overhang),but if you

want to be doubly sure,you can separately weigh the rear axle of the car with no van attached.

The difference between the two rear axle readings obviously is the weight that is transferred to your rear axle.....

but it is NOT TBM. 

As an aside,probably unwise trying to balance the van by filling the rear water tank and leaving the front

empty,as this would likely worsen any swaying you may have.Pajeros are probably OK for small vans,but they

are out of their depth with anything over 2500kg ATM,as you have learned the hard way.

Good luck with your search for a new tow vehicle.

                                                  Cheers

P.S Nice place is Ballarat.I used to drink at the Eureka Stockade Hotel.

 

 



-- Edited by yobarr on Wednesday 31st of January 2018 09:29:51 PM

__________________

v

1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook