An apologist for everything. Oh my god.
I dont know the history of radical islam but I believe it started in the 6th century CE.
Im sure Joshs Mum never shot anyone, bombed anyone, three gay people off buildings or even flew planes into buildings.
She probably was an advocate for womens rights , brought up a wonderful son.
She probably never kidnapped and raped a school load of innocent girls in Africa and didnt marry her cousin or brother.
How dare you bring his Mum into this, youre disgusting.
4. The surviving alleged shooter was supposedly radicalised in 2017-8
So he was radicalised as a teenager (he was born in 2001).
Your post highlights why the main points of Frydenberg's speech make so much sense ...... stop the radicalisation by taking multiple actions. If Frydenbergs action plans has been in place for years this almost certainly would not have happened.
From Wikipedia.
As a teenager, he followed radical Islamic preacher[69] Wissam Haddad, who was found to have violated Australia's racial hatred laws in 2025. (refer to Wikipedia for more).
For his actions, Wissam Haddad was ordered to take down his lectures. What a dreadful punishment.
So if Frydenberg had his way, that preacher and others like him would be in prison or would not otherwise be spreading such views of hatred. So Naveed Akram would have much more limited situations for him to be radicalised. Apart from trying to pick holes in the speech and detract from the main message, do you agree that focusing on reducing radicalisation should be the primary target? Which of Frydenberg's proposed actions to address growing radicalisation do you disagree with? What approaches would you take?
Why do we not hear such words of wisdom from the PM and his team? Nothing to suggest any action is seriously being considered. Just waffly speech and kneejerk reactions about increased gun regulations.
-- Edited by Are We Lost on Wednesday 17th of December 2025 06:16:09 PM
Also the NSW "senator" who marched a few months ago in the front row with a terrorist flag filmed a row or two back from where he was showing his "support" in the front row.
He has gone strangely quiet......
Should be made to go a lot quieter - sacked from the NSW senate would be a good start.
If you people had been in France in 1940 you'd have been asserting "The Germans are not so bad."
Frankly; I am disgusted by your sort - no courage to stand up against evil.
Your accusations are offensive. Not all Muslims are terrorists, as you would want us to believe. And not all Wehrmacht soldiers were Nazis, as you seem to be implying. If anyone is to be despised, it's bigots like you.
__________________
"No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full."
Martin Bryant would be a terrorist by today's standards, as would Timothy McVeigh. Then there's the neo-Nazi terrorist in Norway some years back. So not all terrorists are Muslims, although they are the most organised.
__________________
"No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full."