Sounds good to me. Never liked her but her husband not a bad bloke.
Got to ask the question though, what drives them to do those things. Is it
their own initiative or are they 'forced' by management.

Who is Lisa Wilkinson?

Does Lisa Wilkinson have calluses?  :)

I don't know why she was ever given a Logie, a heavy fine would have been more appropriate, in my opinion.

-- Edited by landy on Thursday 15th of June 2023 09:24:07 AM

deverall11 wrote:

---

 what drives them to do those things

---

 

EGO

Cuppa wrote:

---

Gundog wrote:

---

There has to be a criminal offence she should be charged with and then sent to jail.

 

---

 I assume from the reference to a Logie that she is a Tv personality?  Who is accusing her of what crime? Not all of us watch enough Tv to be familiar with the names of those on it. Is the 'crime' a proven fact or a 'beat up' from the Murdoch media against someone they consider to be on the other side of the fence. ie. Is this about a real crime or just another political thread? 

---

 Rather than make this thread dead, I will refraim from putting Cindy in a difficult position and repeat any actually broadcast details, sufficed to say this is not a beat up from the Murdoch media, but arises from released information about the background of a channel 10 project story, which channel 7 aquired the back story and played portions of that information on one of their programs a couple of sundays ago.

The reason you are not hearing much about this on ABC and Nine's TV and Newspapers are avoiding the whole story where possible for obovious reason which are political dynamite.

And by forum rules Politics is off the table.

PS I make no suggestion that the person in question has actually broken the law, but I hope she can called to account.

-- Edited by Gundog on Thursday 15th of June 2023 10:35:04 AM

deverall11 wrote:

---

Yep no laws broken other then moral and the fact that she's an a$$hole.

---

 

 

Yep, definitely an a$$hole deverall.  And well done using that term. Fits perfectly into today's terminology given that we can longer use terms such as C%$t or P%^&k for fear of offending the "alphabet mob". So a$$hole is perfect because it is "gender neutral"      

Basher wrote:

---

Gee, some of the comments on here are unbelievable at times, usually from the same people
Basher

---

 Do you have a mirror?

Like I said, the same people, with the same old, racist and sexist comments. Nothing to be proud of
Yes I have a mirror, I live in the 21st century, unlike many on hear still living in the dark ages.
You can align yourself with whoever you want to
I am not bitter and twisted like some, sorry, thats just my opion!
This is still a public forum is it not!!!
Basher

This thread has gone cold, so Ill post this now. I thought it was funny.

I think they should be investigated by a disciplinary tribunal consisting of Senator Van, Andrew Laming and Stuart Robert. They will get to the bottom of things.

DMaxer wrote:

---

I think they should be investigated by a disciplinary tribunal consisting of Senator Van, Andrew Laming and Stuart Robert. They will get to the bottom of things.

---

 The fact is Van's actions have been refered for investigation, along he has been removed liberal partyroom, and will sit on the cross bench, also he has been told to resign from the senate.

Laming was cleared of the accusations, and had confidential settlement and apology as a result, Robert I dont know anything about him.

Be careful in pointing the bone, no one was held accountable for the 55 labor staffers complaints, double standards apply.