While it is compulsory to have a 'Do Not etc' sign on the back of all vehicles over 7.5m it is only optional for caravans.
That said I believe that once placed on the back of a caravan it has the same legal status as if it were on the back of a bus, semi trailer or whatever.
Therefore, when you swing wide to make a left hand turn and a vehicle comes through on the inside and collides with the van - with the sign the vehicle is at fault.
Without the sign the caravan driver is at fault!
It is also against the law to have the 'Do Not ...' sign on the right hand side of the van (or indeed any long vehicle) as well as the left - contrary to what you sometimes see.
@Long Weekend, Can you provide a link to support your statement in the post above that it is illegal to have the Do Not Overtake etc etc. on the right hand side of the vehicle? Immediately the situation of a tight roundabout comes to mind whereby a vehicle may attempt to overtake a combination over 7.5 metres long on the right hand side while that combination is turning right within the roundabout. Having driven heavy combination vehicles for many years I can assure you that this can happen with a disturbing majority of times and many trucks have signs on both sides.
-- Edited by Dickodownunder on Monday 1st of October 2018 09:09:49 PM
__________________
"Seek the truth or bury you head in the sand, both require some digging"
It contains this information regarding the placement of signs and which signs are for which application.
Signs that simply state the words "DO NOT OVERTAKE TURNING VEHICLE" for vehicles >7.5m in length are to only be placed on the left hand side of the vehicle.
Cheers - John
__________________
2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan
Thanks for that John (Rockylizard) - I knew about the law from several years ago so would have had to search back. Anyway, I have made sure that all my vans (I'm on my third) have the 'Do Not ' signs on the rear left hand side.
As Dickodownunder says, there are a few around with the incorrect signs and the police do not seem to take any notice.
One thing to watch - there are/have been plates around that do not conform to the specs provided by Rocky John. Read through those to see the minimum size and what is required to be on the signs. If the sign you have in hand does not conform then don't use it.
__________________
PeterD Nissan Navara D23 diesel auto, Spaceland pop-top Retired radio and electronics technician. NSW Central Coast.
@Long Weekend, Can you provide a link to support your statement in the post above that it is illegal to have the Do Not Overtake etc etc. on the right hand side of the vehicle? Immediately the situation of a tight roundabout comes to mind whereby a vehicle may attempt to overtake a combination over 7.5 metres long on the right hand side while that combination is turning right within the roundabout. Having driven heavy combination vehicles for many years I can assure you that this can happen with a disturbing majority of times and many trucks have signs on both sides.
-- Edited by Dickodownunder on Monday 1st of October 2018 09:09:49 PM
unless things have changed it has always been illegal to overtake in a round about
In most cases you use BOTH lanes so you can turn into tight streets without running onto or overvthe curb . Warns cars NOT to come up the side while turning . I keep back on both sides . Especially semis ..
@Long Weekend, Can you provide a link to support your statement in the post above that it is illegal to have the Do Not Overtake etc etc. on the right hand side of the vehicle? Immediately the situation of a tight roundabout comes to mind whereby a vehicle may attempt to overtake a combination over 7.5 metres long on the right hand side while that combination is turning right within the roundabout. Having driven heavy combination vehicles for many years I can assure you that this can happen with a disturbing majority of times and many trucks have signs on both sides.
-- Edited by Dickodownunder on Monday 1st of October 2018 09:09:49 PM
unless things have changed it has always been illegal to overtake in a round about
May very well be illegal dogbox but try driving a semi a b double or a road train through a roundabout.
It is amazing what motorists think they can do around a turning articulated vehicle.
I think it is all about getting ahead of the truck at any cost and any amount of signage will not help stupidity.
-- Edited by Dickodownunder on Wednesday 3rd of October 2018 08:12:27 AM
__________________
"Seek the truth or bury you head in the sand, both require some digging"
@Long Weekend, Can you provide a link to support your statement in the post above that it is illegal to have the Do Not Overtake etc etc. on the right hand side of the vehicle? Immediately the situation of a tight roundabout comes to mind whereby a vehicle may attempt to overtake a combination over 7.5 metres long on the right hand side while that combination is turning right within the roundabout. Having driven heavy combination vehicles for many years I can assure you that this can happen with a disturbing majority of times and many trucks have signs on both sides.
-- Edited by Dickodownunder on Monday 1st of October 2018 09:09:49 PM
unless things have changed it has always been illegal to overtake in a round about
If it is a multi-lane roundabout there is no law against overtaking.
__________________
Neil & Lynne
Pinjarra
Western Australia
MY23.5 Ford Wildtrak V6 Dual Cab / 21' Silverline 21-65.3
The discussion on the topic is great but in reality just remember this. "If you try and pass a heavy vehicle on the left hand side when its turning left you wont be overtaking you will end up UNDERTAKING".