We hear lots of stories about welfare cheats, dole bludgers, people who have never worked a day in their life and so on.
If one of these characters draws a welfare cheque for the whole of their adult life and then, at 65, goes onto an Aged Pension, is that person really "retiring?".
This has bugged me for some time and I'm sure there are a few here that might be able to enlighten me.
There are also many who would like to work and can't for various reasons. Do you include them in your question oh righteous one?
And what difference to society will the answer make?
We hear lots of stories about welfare cheats, dole bludgers, people who have never worked a day in their life and so on.
If one of these characters draws a welfare cheque for the whole of their adult life and then, at 65, goes onto an Aged Pension, is that person really "retiring?".
This has bugged me for some time and I'm sure there are a few here that might be able to enlighten me.
The Phantom
lol Phantom. I reckon you are right. I imagined there are some who have not worked a day in their lives BUT hopeful not too many AND the fraudulent ones get found out!!!
Not only them but as well even. What about the retired ones that live together not married but drawer a single pension because they use 2 different addresses??
__________________
Live Life On Your Terms
DOUGChief One Feather (Losing feathers with age)
TUG.......2014 Holden LT Colorado Twin Cab Ute with Canopy
DEN....... 2014 "Chief" Arrow CV (with some changes)
Centerlink offices are run off there feet because of the shear number of people on benefits, And iff you can't see that there is a problem with a soft government making it to easy to be on welfare, your not living in the real world...
-- Edited by Ron-D on Friday 29th of April 2016 04:52:22 PM
People who have been on some sort of State Welfare for their whole working life obviously have engaged in a lot of serious thinking and planning. Perhaps, so as not to lose this great talent pool, they could be put on as consultants to aspiring welfare recipients.
I don't know where their headquarters would be located, probably somewhere in New Zealand.
-- Edited by DMaxer on Friday 29th of April 2016 05:29:45 PM
There are also many who would like to work and can't for various reasons. Do you include them in your question oh righteous one? And what difference to society will the answer make?
Cheers, Peter
Peter, if you ever get off your high horse you might just learn to recognise a bit of tongue in cheek.
Loosen up, man, show me in the Manual of Life where it says "be forever serious".
To be quite frank (although I am really John) I think the answer to both conundrums is quite possibly philosophically the same.
Should there indeed be a welfare recipient who has endured an entire life wallowing in the excesses of such luxury and then has the considerable good fortune to continue that luxurious lifestyle in receipt of that 'financial safety net' so sought by so many upon reaching the not so aged age of 65, then that person just MAY be the only person who might have experienced the falling of a tree in the forest when they were not there ... consequently being aware of resultant outcome.
For as Buddha once said - The mind is everything. What you think you become.
cheers - John
__________________
2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan
G'day Aus-Kiwi. Are you talking about tree hugging Greenies, Greenies of the naval variety (electricians), Greenies of the wet variety (large waves breaking over the bows of ships) or the other type of Greenies the cold, wet, and drinkable variety (VB). Sorry all could not help my self. Ps You are right. Never feel sorrow for welfare cheats.
Cheers.
__________________
Jack Cherie and the memory of the four legged kids.
I reckon that you are missing the point guys. Thinking that someone on the dole through their working life and then moving across to the pension is a problem? Whats wrong with you all? The fact is that the long term dole recipient is in fact retired. It is the fault of centrelink to not realise this and reclassify their payments earlier. Had an ex brother in law who was fitter and stronger than anyone I know but who never worked a day in his life. Survived on the dole with a wife and 3 kids. Until she got smart and kicked him out. When I complained to my father in law about him, he correctly informed me that the guy was lucky enough to have retired onto a pension of sorts from the start of his working life unlike us poor souls who actually had jobs before we retired. Last time I saw him he was waxing up his board. Paid for by his now pension I guess. So dont be so hard on these poor souls who dont philosophically believe in actually working and contributing to society.
Poor buggars. I reckon that this must be some sort of workism attitude against their strongly held belief in a life of luxury, entitlement and self indulgence.
Gotta go now and try to get a job so I can pay some income tax so as to support him. Hooroo
phil
There are also many who would like to work and can't for various reasons. Do you include them in your question oh righteous one? And what difference to society will the answer make?
Cheers, Peter
Peter, if you ever get off your high horse you might just learn to recognise a bit of tongue in cheek.
Loosen up, man, show me in the Manual of Life where it says "be forever serious".
The Phantom
Yes, it is easy to ridicule and make fun of those less fortunate that yourself.
There are also many who would like to work and can't for various reasons. Do you include them in your question oh righteous one? And what difference to society will the answer make?
Cheers, Peter
Pete, we are talking about cheats not deserving people.
We hear lots of stories about welfare cheats, dole bludgers, people who have never worked a day in their life and so on.
If one of these characters draws a welfare cheque for the whole of their adult life and then, at 65, goes onto an Aged Pension, is that person really "retiring?".
This has bugged me for some time and I'm sure there are a few here that might be able to enlighten me.
The Phantom
Hello The Phantom and everyone contributing to this topic
I shall give my answer in two parts.
Firstly and most important to me, (so I could therefore be wrong), my moral answer is that I fully agree with Peter n Margaret, as it is a very fine line between being a welfare cheat, and being forced onto welfare
Quote There are also many who would like to work and can't for various reasons. Do you include them in your question oh righteous one? And what difference to society will the answer make? Unquote
Secondly, I shall try to answer the question, as I have interpreted it, so once again, I could therefore be wrong, perhaps twice over, as I may have misinterpreted the question
My interpretation of the OP question was, does a person who has been on welfare payment all their life actually retire, then my answer is no, they do not retire
With absolutely no disrespect intended towards anyone, as I have only ever heard about, and never actually met a so called welfare cheat. I will try to justify my answer from firsthand experience.
From my years of 15 until 15˝ through no fault of my own, I was not allowed into the employment playground because it was full. Therefore but for the grace of God, there go I.
From my years of 61 until 65, once again through no fault of my own, I was thrown out of the employment playground, due to being no longer medically fit to play. If this had happened in my younger years, prior to having sewed a deep pocket into my clothes, so that my short arm, and hot little hand, could not reach the coin, then once again, it would have been a case of, but for the grace of God, there go I
The day of my 65th birthday, which in normal circumstances would have been a milestone of leaving the employment playground, and entering the retirement playground, never happened. It was just another day to me.
I will therefore assume that the people of the OP question, will feel the same as I felt, on their 65th birthday, I do not believe they will feel as though they have retired.
My opinion is that people who had never entered the employment playground, for whatever reason, will never enter the retirement playground, as they will not be experienced enough to realise, that they have just walked through the gate, of the dividing fence.
It is unfortunate that the written word, in and by itself, is often unable to clearly communicate the intent of the author ... and subtlety is so often definitely overlooked.
Compound this with the comprehension of the reader and much intended content is misunderstood.
It was attributed (incorrectly) to one exulted gentleman that life was not mean to be easy - but it is equally true to not take life TOO seriously as none of us are getting out it alive.
Cheers - John
__________________
2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 SE Auto - 2008 23ft Golden Eagle Hunter Some people feel the rain - the others just get wet - Bob Dylan
There are also many who would like to work and can't for various reasons. Do you include them in your question oh righteous one? And what difference to society will the answer make?
Cheers, Peter
Pete, we are talking about cheats not deserving people.
Aussie Paul.
The problem with that Paul, is that it is very often/usually not possible to tell the difference.
The result becomes welfare bashing, much like discussing particular racial or religious groups or refugees.
I was at centerlink a while back a new experience for me making an enquiry as to eligibility for oap or health care card or what ever I was entitled to. was talking to a fellow an stated he had 3months to go till he was entitled to the oap an he couldn't wait so he didn't have to keep going thru the bs of pretending to look for a job then said he hadn't worked since he was 19 yrs old . poor old me worked all my life an I'm entitled to absolutely nothing
Yes, that is not a life style that more than a handful of people would choose, given the option.
It is a rut that they get themselves into and don't know how to escape.
And society is not good at helping them. We prefer the ridicule approach.
Don't let them wear you down Peter, there is, and never will be anything wrong with showing true compassion...not smug verbal sentiments....
In reality the Old Age Pension is substantially about, AGE, ELIGIBILITY, SAFETY NET, rather than desire to rort ""their"" system....
Their arguments are well balanced...with a chip on both shoulders....
I have a theory that many Australians with a Superannuation Nest Egg which they would never have had, had the 'system' not set it up for them...now consider themselves some sort of 'nouveau riche'...Australians of days gone by really did have a 'hail mate well met' basic consideration of others....today, greed, envy, corruption, power, wealth,...and its all about me....rule the Australian day. with its penchant for hourly/daily Stock Exchange/World Currency changes......any wonder drug taking is now so rife/endemic........main reason I respect my little dog companion more than most Australians these days...
The question was no doubt intended to drag out all the prejudices/cliches' that often flourish just below the surface on this Forum and indeed most Australian Forums...that, it has achieved, and likely will continue in this thread...and at the end of it...it will have changed absolutely nothing...zilch....except re-inforce the prejudices of the quasi nouveau riche' ' envious wanna be's' of Australia today.....our Governments with six Prime Ministers in six years now truly reflect these new Australian ""values""....
I admire my dog for his genuineness and appreciate the Australian Country Towns/Bush which still better reflect the genuine 'Australian'....
If someone is eligible and has turned the requisite age for the Age Pension/Retirement...give it to them without qualification as to how much or little they may have contributed..hell, very few of us are in it for the long haul and with any degree of good health after we turn 65...a lot of my departed mates would swap me for a chance at life.......live and let live...Hoo Roo
__________________
'The secret of happiness is not in seeking more, but in developing the capacity to enjoy less'.Socrates BC399.
'Be a Cheerful Nomad, not a Grumpy Gromad, it's the Surly Bird who catches the Germ'!
I doubt if we shall see that man in the Grey Nomad playground, as you will need at least a bicycle, a tent, and no debts to do the lap
Gday...
OI - AND a grey water tank ! ! ! !
OOPS ... AND a WDH ! ! !
Cheers - John
Hello rockylizard
Not intending to attempt to take anything away from Peter n Margaret, as I completely agree with him, on this topic. So thanks for speaking up for him goldfinger
I do have a sense of humour, which I actually find hard to convey, in the printed word.
Perhaps I should put up some jokes, later on
In reply to your post
Tongue in cheek I stand corrected, rockylizard Yes he will need a grey water tank, as he will obviously have to free camp. Yes he will need some sort of WDH, as his trailer, to hold his grey water tank, would mostly likely be an old pram from the roadside/curb rubbish pickup The grey water will slosh around, making his trailer unstable on his downhill runs.
The only good thing about it is that like myself, he will learn to be polite, while travelling, which should benefit our Grey Nomad society
He will eventually learn to say the same as I do, upon a first introduction Hello my name is (insert name here), I have come to borrow (insert amount here).
My mother always said that I must never loan money to a person, I had never been introduced to Being the polite person I think I am, the introduction always comes first, so they know who they are loaning to
On a more serious note
Quote from dogbox was talking to a fellow an stated he had 3months to go till he was entitled to the oap an he couldn't wait so he didn't have to keep going thru the bs of pretending to look for a job then said he hadn't worked since he was 19 yrs old Unquote
Perhaps the man in question, thought that the Old Age Pension card, was actually a Get Out of the Centerlink Queue card. I still do not think that he knows what retirement is all about I can only wish him well, on his retirement, and be thankful that I was never in his shoes
We hear lots of stories about welfare cheats, dole bludgers, people who have never worked a day in their life and so on.
If one of these characters draws a welfare cheque for the whole of their adult life and then, at 65, goes onto an Aged Pension, is that person really "retiring?".
This has bugged me for some time and I'm sure there are a few here that might be able to enlighten me.
The Phantom
Here's an idea, way out of centre field. Why not have a two tier pension scheme. Those who have worked and paid taxes for a productive number of years (pick a number) receive a significantly higher rate of OAP than those that have not contributed.
Yes, that is not a life style that more than a handful of people would choose, given the option. It is a rut that they get themselves into and don't know how to escape. And society is not good at helping them. We prefer the ridicule approach.
Cheers, Peter
There are actually quite a few that make it a profession, and are quite happy, to stay on welfare too though. Where I live, back in the 90's, there was a swag of them living in one of the lower rent areas, simply because they were then far enough away, not to have to attend the dole office once a week. Some of them were even my customers, but I always made sure I got the cash before handing over their goods. I only got stung once....
And I'm in the same boat as a couple of the other posters, I have never been, nor ever will be, eligible to receive the dole or the OAP. Simply because I pulled me finger out and made sure I'd have something to live on when I did/do (not sure if I have finished yet LOL) finish up working.
I also agree with paying them the greater percentage of their welfare in food stamps and clothing coupons too... But that is another debate..
-- Edited by 03_Troopy on Saturday 30th of April 2016 05:06:28 PM
__________________
Yes I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
Don't let them wear you down Peter, there is, and never will be anything wrong with showing true compassion...not smug verbal sentiments.... In reality the Old Age Pension is substantially about, AGE, ELIGIBILITY, SAFETY NET, rather than desire to rort ""their"" system.... Their arguments are well balanced...with a chip on both shoulders.... I have a theory that many Australians with a Superannuation Nest Egg which they would never have had, had the 'system' not set it up for them...now consider themselves some sort of 'nouveau riche'...Australians of days gone by really did have a 'hail mate well met' basic consideration of others....today, greed, envy, corruption, power, wealth,...and its all about me....rule the Australian day. with its penchant for hourly/daily Stock Exchange/World Currency changes......any wonder drug taking is now so rife/endemic........main reason I respect my little dog companion more than most Australians these days...
The question was no doubt intended to drag out all the prejudices/cliches' that often flourish just below the surface on this Forum and indeed most Australian Forums...that, it has achieved, and likely will continue in this thread...and at the end of it...it will have changed absolutely nothing...zilch....except re-inforce the prejudices of the quasi nouveau riche' ' envious wanna be's' of Australia today.....our Governments with six Prime Ministers in six years now truly reflect these new Australian ""values"".... I admire my dog for his genuineness and appreciate the Australian Country Towns/Bush which still better reflect the genuine 'Australian'....
If someone is eligible and has turned the requisite age for the Age Pension/Retirement...give it to them without qualification as to how much or little they may have contributed..hell, very few of us are in it for the long haul and with any degree of good health after we turn 65...a lot of my departed mates would swap me for a chance at life.......live and let live...Hoo Roo
With an answer that profound, Mr Goldfinger, I would expect nothing less than an attempt to answer John's philosophical conundrum. Does the tree really make a noise?
Why not have a go while you are on a roll.
As for some of the other posts here, I haven't laughed so much since Bandar, the pygmy chief, dropped his daks at a cannibal feast.