it would depend on fast you travel an how far you go example if you spent $1000 dollars setting one up an you saved 1 cent per klm in fuel(speeds over 90 kph) you would have to drive 100,000 klm plus of highway driving to even come anywhere near covering the cost they are effective on highway trucks because they travel at highway speeds 2-300,000 klm or more per year not really a good from an economical point if you tow your van 5-10000 klm per year an if it is not able to be removed or lowered when not towing it could cost you fuel because of the extra drag
someone maybe able to come up with some technical data to confirm or deny the above statement
how does doug know phil was in the naughty room so often is it because he sees him there????
-- Edited by dogbox on Tuesday 4th of August 2015 05:18:30 PM
And it's welcome from us two 2 philbe don't know about these on cars but I remember a myth buster program that did a test on a "pickup Truck " in the states, two brand new trucks were filled and then run till they stopped one with the tail gate up one down.
And the winner was by a fair margin
Tailgate
UP
Yes I know the driver can make a fair difference to fuel consumption too.
Make of it what you will .
Woody
__________________
When the power of Love becomes greater than the love of power the World will see peace ! 24ft Trailblazer 5th wheeler n 05 Patrol ute and Black Series Dominator camper trailer ( for the rough stuff)
Why is it that everybody likens traveling through air, to that of forcing a wedge to make a track through margarine? That the air will part away, allowing the vehicle to sail through, and achieving a 50% decrease in fuel consumption to-boot. Unfortunately air does not behave like margarine, the air will be turbulent over protruding surfaces, and blunt ends, causing negative pressure areas and the result is drag.
Drag increases at the square of the speed, a body traveling very slowly will develop very little drag, For example a person going for a walk. If that person starts running the resultant drag will go up by the square of the speed increase.
This drag can be reduced, for example in the case of the runner with slippery suits, but the interesting thing is it not the front of the body which is the culprit but the back. Have a look at nature and we see some fish, whales and our parrots having blunt fronts, but they all have streamlined rear bodies.
We have the conception that by putting a point on something, then it will cut through the air, and while that may be true with high speed bodies, the main source of the problem is protrusions and poor streamlining at the rear.
Unfortunately your 4 x 4, Motor home and or caravan has the streamlining of a brick. About the only thing that may reduce drag as far as I am concerned is making the sides of the vehicles smooth, no protrusions. Aircraft do use protrusions; they deploy them as air brakes.
Protrusions may be TV aerials, satellite dishes, solar panels, air conditioners, awnings, vents, roof racks and deflectors. Well that was what I was taught early on in my career.
That was very well explained Iana, you explained that in a similar way to a yachtie friend who was teaching me how to sail his 42ft Jeanneau. Already I'm a better tower than a sailor.