check out the new remote control Jockey Wheel SmartBar Canegrowers rearview170 Cobb Grill Skid Row Recovery Gear Caravan Industry Association of Australia
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: More solar questions


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 865
Date:
RE: More solar questions


The panels I am using are a bit different, they are light weight semi flexible panels. Their stated specs are:

Rated Power 100W,

Vm 17.7V

Im 5.62A

Voc 21.6V

Isc 5.97A

In the sun they get hot, full sun they get to 70+ degrees. Thus I have decided not to mount them directly on the roof, but to put them on top of 10mm of foil board, reduces the roof temperature by up to 30 degrees, but it does not stop the panel heating up.

The Temperature Coefficient PMax is -0.38% so at 70 degrees the power will drop to about 83W.

For Voc -0.27%, so max volts will drop to 18.98V.

For Isc it is 0.05% so current will rise slightly to 6.1A

Even with tjat drop it is more than enough for our needs. Especially when you consider that my 1,200W of panels weigh a total of 16.2Kg.

 

 

 



__________________

 

Discovery 4, 

Retreat Brampton

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 564
Date:

Would perforated board work better at keeping the panels cooler?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 865
Date:

Sorry Brian,

I was using a brand name (see link below), it is actually a specialised insulationproduct, it consists of 10mm of closed cell foam (polystyrene I think), with a layer of foil on each side. It works well as an insulator, and to be honest I am not worried about the loss of performance from the panels. I have about twice as many as I need anyway.

Our van is being built ot be efficient, with the exception of our fridge which is a compressor fridge, and I expect it to draw about 100ah / day on the 12v circuit. so 55Ah @ 24V (assume some loss on conversion). The air con is an inverter split system drawing up to 2.8A when running. I expect 1,200W of panels will mean I can run the air con, and charge the batteries during the day, then run the air con for most of the night if we wanted to. 

http://www.foilboard.com.au/

 

 



__________________

 

Discovery 4, 

Retreat Brampton

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:

Thanks Brian that is very comprehensive.

 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 347
Date:


Dont put solar panels directly on the roof, They get excessively hot,

Sit the panels up about 75 mm minimum off the roof, The draught underneath keeps them cool.

__________________
Cheers, Brian,


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 865
Date:

Thanks Brian,

The panels I am using are not the traditional stiff panels in the allow frame with a sheet of glass at the front. They have the solar cells bonded into a semi flexible 3mm thick sandwich of TPT and a clear material. As I mentioned earlier they get hot, and when they are hot they become very flexible, thus need to be supported. 

Sitting these particular panels on top of a 10mm thick piece of polystyrene works for them, and insulates the roof, but I would not recommend it for traditional panels where it makes far more sense to use their structure and set them up with an air gap as you recommend.

 



__________________

 

Discovery 4, 

Retreat Brampton

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 70
Date:

There is a very good reason to use a DC to DC charger rather than rely on the vehicle alternator. The DC to DC charger will bring your batteries up their full SOC whereas the alternator will not achieve this.

If you find yourself in a series of bad solar days and you have to run the engine to top your batteries up you will be very pleased to get the extra charge from the DC to DC charger.

One thing to be careful of with DC to DC chargers is their standby current which is a drain on your vehicle battery. Best to wire it up through your ignition system so that it is only connected when the engine is running.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1743
Date:

baysidetas wrote:

There is a very good reason to use a DC to DC charger rather than rely on the vehicle alternator. The DC to DC charger will bring your batteries up their full SOC whereas the alternator will not achieve this.

If you find yourself in a series of bad solar days and you have to run the engine to top your batteries up you will be very pleased to get the extra charge from the DC to DC charger.

One thing to be careful of with DC to DC chargers is their standby current which is a drain on your vehicle battery. Best to wire it up through your ignition system so that it is only connected when the engine is running.


 

HI

Well actually you may find that is not the best way to get a quick charge into the house battery ,unless you have a HIGH current dc /dc charger!!

 

Depending on the vehicle system ,most alternators will put in more charge [ Ahrs] in a short time  than a 20 or 49A dc/dc charger l

Of course this does require the charge circuit to be wired as it should be, with low voltage loss cabling

 

It is when the Alternator output voltage is reduced[ as in some late model vehicles] by the electronic engine management system,  that a high current  DC /Dc charger would be more  likely to quickly charge the house battery 

Of course that is understandable, as such a vehicle management  system, is unlikely to really FULLY charge the vehicle battery so has no hope of even near  fully  charging a remote battery

 

THe final decision on which method is best ,depends on many factors. 

It is not as simple as some would like to believe or make outno

 

 

PeterQ



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook