check out the new remote control Jockey Wheel SmartBar Canegrowers rearview170 Cobb Grill Skid Row Recovery Gear Caravan Industry Association of Australia
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Vehicle Towing Comparison


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Date:
Vehicle Towing Comparison


First time I have seen this data collated.



Attachments
__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5447
Date:

Gravy73 wrote:

First time I have seen this data collated.


 Have seen this before, in a digital mag, put together by a journalist, parts of the data I find to be right but I narrow sighted only check what I need to know.

By the end of August it will be out of date as I am almost sure it is already but the way data is layed out can be updated to help a someone who is the market for a new tow vehicle and looking for information. 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Gravy73 wrote:

First time I have seen this data collated.


 Hi Graeme. Initially I was going to refrain from commenting on this,but I couldn't help myself,as there is not one vehicle on that list that can safely reach its claimed towing capacity.Not one. There are various reasons for this,but the main one is that the low rear-axle capacity of all of these cars. Providing "information" such as that listed only gives a false sense of security to those who have NO understanding of weights,and encourages recently retired Ma and Pa Kettle,who have never driven anything bigger than a Corolla,to rush out and buy the flash 6000kg GCM twin-cab ute,hook up the flash 3500kg ATM van,and set sail to see the world.This is an accident looking for a place to happen,as always the weight on the wheels of the car should be at least 10% more than the weight on the van's wheels if safety is of any concern.This can never be achieved with tge listed cars if they're towing at their rated maximum.Please note,Graeme,that this is in no way a criticism of you,as your intentions are good,but information such as that provided no doubt contributes to many caravan accidents.Cheers



__________________

v



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 339
Date:

I thought the Isuzu MUX was 3000kg Max Tow Capacity with a 300kg Tow Ball weight.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

KevinJ wrote:

I thought the Isuzu MUX was 3000kg Max Tow Capacity with a 300kg Tow Ball weight.


 Good point there,Kevin! Although I was aware of that limitation,I was more interested in some of the other vehicles.Like all other cars on the list,the MUX has NO chance of safely towing the ATM van that it is rated to tow,in this case a 3000kg van,although a friend of mine proudly tells that he and his wife completed a "full lap mate" with an MUX towing a van that weighed "just over 3 ton mate"."No worries mate". He tells anyone who'll listen that this great feat was achieved because he is "highly experienced",and "drives to the conditions mate".He was far from impressed when I told him that his great "achievement" was more a result of good luck than good management.Cheers.

3A548F0C-A485-4F6F-AD44-37A7D0E211A5.png



-- Edited by yobarr on Friday 6th of August 2021 04:28:16 PM

Attachments
__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

KevinJ wrote:

I thought the Isuzu MUX was 3000kg Max Tow Capacity with a 300kg Tow Ball weight.


 Just found this! You'd have to be joking,surely? The current model has only a 1600kg rear axle,I believe,and has no chance of having the generally accepted 10% towball weight with a 3000kg ATM van.How on earth is it now legal to tow 3500kg ATM with it? These tow ratings are a joke,with the only consideration being the power and suitability of the engine and transmission,and braking ability.Physics doesn't seem to come into the equation.Will be interesting to see what GCM is.Cheers

31E7995D-5C3A-43D3-A0CD-0120AEFA8D9E.png



Attachments
__________________

v



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4443
Date:

In their new specs, they claim axles are upgraded(mux mob)

__________________

Cheers Craig



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Craig1 wrote:

In their new specs, they claim axles are upgraded(mux mob)


 Hmm.That's interesting,Craig,because the site I got my info from tells a completely different story.Doesn't really matter though,as towing 3500kg behind an MUX is an exercise in stupidity.Cheers



-- Edited by yobarr on Friday 6th of August 2021 05:28:01 PM

__________________

v



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Date:

Vehicle weights are specified with only 10 litres of fuel on board something to be considered when calculating available payload.


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Gravy73 wrote:

Vehicle weights are specified with only 10 litres of fuel on board something to be considered when calculating available payload.


 Makes little difference,Graeme,as always the limiting factor is the lightweight rear axle. You'd have to be a few cents short of a dollar to try to tow a 3500kg ATM van (PIG trailer) with an MUX.Cheers



__________________

v



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Date:

Mate I have just been through a circus to find a tug that I can legally tow my van with an upgraded ATM of 2700 kg and tow bar download of 246kg. I got severely bitten, the original compliance plate ATM was 2240 which I could have just legally towed with my Hilux with a GCM of 5030. A trip over the scales destroyed all past beliefs with the added factor of having to get an ATM upgrade.

Sale of the Hilux plus a Volvo XC60 resulted in purchase of a Land Rover Discovery which gives me considerable latitude to tow legally, Land cruisers were not in my budget.

I feel for others caught in this present loop of vehicle and caravan sales misinformation, it is time for the bureaucrats to get involved to protect purchasers. The 3500 tow ratings have to be amended and Compliance Plate values must be based upon a loaded van with accessories fitted and water tanks and gas bottles full.

 

 

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4375
Date:

Ahh but .............
Go to a dog trailer configuration and it all looks very different.

P1000697E.jpg

Cheers,

Peter



Attachments
__________________

OKA196, 4x4 'C' Class, DIY, self contained motorhome. 960W of solar, 400Ah of AGMs, 310L water, 280L fuel. https://www.oka4wd.com/forum/members-vehicles-public/569-oka196-xt-motorhome
 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Peter_n_Margaret wrote:

Ahh but .............
Go to a dog trailer configuration and it all looks very different.

P1000697E.jpg

Cheers,

Peter


 Peter,you are,of course,right.But with many drivers unable to reverse even a PIG trailer,can you imagine the absolute circus if DOG trailers became popular with vanners? Mind you,it would keep cars like Tritons legal,at least.Cheers

2BA8DEDB-33FF-460E-B4F8-89749411275F.png



Attachments
__________________

v

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Purchase Grey Nomad bumper stickers Read our daily column, the Nomad News The Grey Nomad's Guidebook