Brilliant setup Peter.....I will now consider hinging the last 3 panels on my van's roof.Have you ever considered hinging each end of the panel as well,to create an El Cheapo sun tracker? Without moving the vehicle,you could then follow the sun all day, assuming the front of the car faced South(ish).Cheers.
Our original roof panels were set up to allow hinging.
Too hard - set and forget is a better option and add an extra panel.
The first requirement for the one over the rear window was to provide some shade. The extra solar collection was the bonus. a couple of gas struts would make it neater.
No reason why you could not put them down each ide of a van too, if you weren't into bush bashing, like we do often.
Cheers,
Peter
Our original roof panels were set up to allow hinging. Too hard - set and forget is a better option and add an extra panel. The first requirement for the one over the rear window was to provide some shade. The extra solar collection was the bonus. a couple of gas struts would make it neater. No reason why you could not put them down each ide of a van too, if you weren't into bush bashing, like we do often. Cheers, Peter
Thats interesting,Peter.I have 3 panels facing the front of the van,at about the 30 degree pitch of the van front,with the rest flat on the roof.Seems it would be easier just to leave things as they are? Cheers
Great idea Peter, but possibly you mostly go around up north where the flat panels on the roof work OK in winter, but having hinged panels would help down south. I found having portable panels in winter made a lot of difference as you could chase the sun several times a day and increase the yield a lot. No special props or legs just use a fence or trees etc.
BUT my dream is get a tiny cheap Hiab with the panels on a frame on the end and just set them up to an angle in comfort from the ground if needed, or out the side away from the shade with the bus under a tree, or just flat on the roof normally. Hmmmm........
No doubt there will be lots of new solar panel developments in the near future as costs continue to decrease and uses increase. Exciting times.
When we bought the first panels for the OKA just 16 years ago, they cost $9 per watt for good quality rigid panels. The going rate now is under $1.
Some of the flexible panels still have problems, but they will be solved fairly quickly, I reckon, and when you look at the material content involved, they might even be cheaper than rigid panels eventually.
Regarding use up north compared to down south, it is not as dramatic as it might seem. Power requirements for the fridge are much lower down south and in summer at least, the days are longer.
We spent several weeks in Norway north of the Arctic Circle in a motorhome. Solar power was never an issue. Our needs were much lower and the sun did not set, so even at midnight there was still a bit of solar dribbling in.
We had 2 back up systems. Direct charging from the alternator and an Efoy fuel cell that produced 75W continuously 24/7 with about the same noise as a compressor fridge and zero pollution.
Winter needs a different approach.
Cheers,
Peter
While stopped at Barcaldine a couple of days ago, I saw two vans with tilt-able panels.
The ones on the side were on stainless racks & appeared that they could swing to capture the sun while the front & back were tilted about 15 degrees - facing the front & the back. It possibly was a good system as they caught the sun wherever it was but the wind resistance must have been terrible with all this metal sticking up.
Having a poptop & getting weaker by the year, I doubt whether I could fit them.
Plain Truth,
With panels generally needing 25mm of air clearance under them to dissipate the heat, how do the Kedron ones work?
__________________
Warren
----------------
If you don't get it done today, there's always tomorrow!
I do notice that the thin film panels, have a theoretically 21 - 22% efficiency rate, while older panels seem to be between 17 - 19% (My own layman research while surfing the net)
In my opinion, it could be well worth carrying on with this research, as the benefits seem to be, cheaper to manufacturer, lighter, and more efficient solar panels
I shall just have to hurry up and wait, until they become mainstream
................... older panels seem to be between 17 - 19% ..................
17-19% is if they are "good" panels.
That translates to 170 - 190W per M2 of cell area, so that is an easy way to check if the claimed output of a panel it likely to be genuine, or not (at standard testing parameters).
I recently purchased some new panels that were claimed to be 300W each.
I will actually be very happy if they are 180W and not too upset if they are 150W.