It should already be loaded and fully download automatically with your 1st auto download or when you run any registered software like "Office" and it does an auto download then
I don't find it very effective at all and feedback from the IT nerds I know reckon its a big risk using it as your only means of protection. My son, who is an IT software writer tested it on a cheap laptop and while Defender seemed to be working, within about 2 weeks it was so corrupted with malware, that the device wouldn't even turn on and he had to do whatever they do to clean it up and get it running again.
I know you specifically weren't interested in alternatives, but having bagged Windows Defender, I need to offer something that I have found great. For the past 4 years Ive used "Trend" as it takes up little of your devices memory, doesn't slow your tablet (or whatever youre using) down and works in the background, only telling you when it has detected virus' or malware etc. You can also run it to do a manual search - very easy - if you want.
__________________
Cheers Bruce
The amazing things you see when nomading Australia
For about the past five years I've used AVG Free edition and a test by a pc engineer using a program did not find any virus's or malware problems, this is on my main pc, so I might load that on and see what happens.
Thanks for the tip on Trend, I know it has a good reputation, but I have also been very happy with AVG in the past (and it's free).
Vic I haven't used defender because Ive been advised not too. I do use AVG and Malwarebites and CCleaner (all free) and up to now have had no problems (wish i hadn't said that now)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Defender is only available for Windows 8. I have Windows 7 and use Microsoft Security Essentials which seems to do the job. For many years I used AVG free anti virus but found the free version does not give the same protection now as the more professional versions. The paid version of AVG would provide good security...
__________________
Retired Airline Pilot and Electrician..
I'm not old, I've just been young a long time....Ken
Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Thanks Friar, I've decided to use AVG, but still have Defender on, it doesn't seem to clash with AVG but AVG is the dominant anti virus.
You are right BG, different names but basically the same program but give similar cover. I recall I was advised by Bigpond tech not to rely on Security Essentials or Defender and to add another anti virus program for my main pc, I had forgotten that.
1. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Defender is only available for Windows 8. I have Windows 7 and use Microsoft Security Essentials which seems to do the job.
2. For many years I used AVG free anti virus but found the free version does not give the same protection now as the more professional versions. The paid version of AVG would provide good security...
1, This is not as simple as you make out. Defencer has been around since Vista. It has changed its form since that period.
2. That is a lie, propagated by the unscrupulous individuals to attempt to retail you the complete suite. Any of the security suites that offer the anti-virus section of their suite offer the free module exactly the same as included in the suite.
The same deal goes with firewalls. ZoneAlarm comes bundled in suites. However it is also comes on its own exactly the same programme as you pay for in suites. You get a firewall in the Avast or AVG suits but they are not as good as ZoneAlarm. If you cherry pick the free anti-virus, malware and firewall programmes then you can make up a much better package. Suites have the advantage that after you have paid through the nose for them they are easier to install and manage as they come in one package. If you are prepared to do your homework and select components for suite and manage each programme separately then you can develop a better suite of programmes.
I have occasionally encountered false positives with several AV products. If you suspect that a particular file is infected, or is being falsely reported as being infected, then upload it to a site such as the following:
I use Microsoft Security Essentials, no problems, I also run Malabytes. I used to use Nortons 360 and Bit Defender. Microsoft Security Essentials does it all as far as I am concerned. I have no Virus or malaware. I also use Crap Cleaner CCleaner.
I use Microsoft Security Essentials too on Windows 7. Been good for 4 years and has eliminated a couple of troubles that I have had without difficulty . I have set my system for auto updates so it is always up to date.
I asked the very experienced computer tech at the place where I had worked, and he said why pay for the others when it is just as good, and that is what he uses at home !! He believes the other antivirus programs just talk up the problems to boost sales. Note he works at a university where viruses just come in and go round and round every day.
To all the users of Microsoft Security Essentials, if you go up to my message @ 15:39 Nov 19, 2014 you will see a link for a site with industry comparisons of anti-virus. Go particularly to page http://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/ and you will see how poor the Micro$oft offerings are.
__________________
PeterD Nissan Navara D23 diesel auto, Spaceland pop-top Retired radio and electronics technician. NSW Central Coast.
Over the past 15 years I've used Norton, McAfee, Trend, AVG and Bit Defender, since buying a new PC running Windows 8.1 in Jan this year have been using Windows Defender without problem, it runs unobtrusively in the background, unlike most of the others I have used.
I also scan regularly with Malwarebytes, it has yet to pick up anything that Windows Defender has let through.
Yes, I am an experienced PC user.
You pay for Windows Defender with the operating System, why not use it?
Most of the review sites have vested interests, including AV-Test, Wikepedia says,
"The respected security researcher and CEO of Kaspersky Labs "Eugene Kaspersky" has discredited stating that AV-TEST has changed their policy and is no longer a trust worthy accreditation."
ISTM that the best defence would be to avoid making yourself a target.
I would think that malware authors would target the most popular operating systems and AV software, in which case I would expect that malware would be aimed at Microsoft's products before others. It might sound contrarian, but perhaps it would be safer to use less popular AV software (eg ClamAV freeware)???
__________________
"No friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full."
Risk is also directly related to your browsing habits, if your a regular down loader of freeware and visit porn sites etc, you will be at much higher risk than those who don't.
Seems to be a lot of mixed opinions on what is best.
In regards to Windows Defender, I would imagine that if you are running Windows it would be using the system anyway as they don't want any crap getting through to stuff up their system, so would/should be right on the ball with updated anti virus etc.
As mine seems to be running both that and AVG in conjunction I wonder if the AVG (or whatever else you are using for Windows in addition to Defender) acts as a second line of defence????
Evening Vic, I'm not suggesting Defender is the best, other antivirus programs may well be better, particularly if people visit risky sites, however I've found Defender used in conjunction with Malwarebytes quite adequate for my needs.
Mind you I do not visit dodgy sites etc and am careful what I open, so I suppose that helps.
Morning Vic,
Your 7/8th of the way there without even trying, not saying we won't pick something up, however you are certainly minimizing the risk with safe browsing habits and care opening attachments.