Even though many of the board members have resigned what's the bet that a few bribes here and there, after the enquiry, the Star Entertainment gets back its casino licence? Possibly under a different name.
Bobdown said
05:32 PM May 31, 2022
Buzz Lightbulb wrote:
Even though many of the board members have resigned what's the bet that a few bribes here and there, after the enquiry, the Star Entertainment gets back its casino licence? Possibly under a different name.
Wouldn't bet on it.......
peter67 said
05:59 PM May 31, 2022
You're on Bob, I'll bet my left nut Buzz is right, no wait...if I'm wrong Buzz will donate one of his :)
Magnarc said
08:58 AM Jun 1, 2022
Buzz Lightbulb wrote:
Even though many of the board members have resigned what's the bet that a few bribes here and there, after the enquiry, the Star Entertainment gets back its casino licence? Possibly under a different name. no
Purely as a matter of interest Buzz, what is the significance of the word "no" at the end of your posts? Try as I might I can think of no reason for it.
peter67 said
09:07 AM Jun 1, 2022
Italian heritage?
Buzz Lightbulb said
03:40 PM Jun 1, 2022
Magnarc wrote:
Buzz Lightbulb wrote:
Even though many of the board members have resigned what's the bet that a few bribes here and there, after the enquiry, the Star Entertainment gets back its casino licence? Possibly under a different name. no
Purely as a matter of interest Buzz, what is the significance of the word "no" at the end of your posts? Try as I might I can think of no reason for it.
I don't see that my original post. It's possibly a bug in the web interface.
-- Edited by Buzz Lightbulb on Wednesday 1st of June 2022 03:41:29 PM
watsea said
08:22 AM Jun 3, 2022
Buzz Lightbulb wrote:
Even though many of the board members have resigned what's the bet that a few bribes here and there, after the enquiry, the Star Entertainment gets back its casino licence? Possibly under a different name.
The "no" in Buzz's post wasn't on my screeen. Just the head shaking emoji.
-- Edited by watsea on Friday 3rd of June 2022 08:22:47 AM
The counsel assisting the enquiry into the Star Casino in Sydney suggests that it's not suitable to hold a casino licence:
Star Entertainment Group not suitable to run Sydney casino, inquiry told:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-05-31/star-not-suitable-to-hold-licence-casino-inquiry-hears-/101113224
Even though many of the board members have resigned what's the bet that a few bribes here and there, after the enquiry, the Star Entertainment gets back its casino licence? Possibly under a different name.
Wouldn't bet on it.......
Buzz Lightbulb wrote:
Even though many of the board members have resigned what's the bet that a few bribes here and there, after the enquiry, the Star Entertainment gets back its casino licence? Possibly under a different name. no
Purely as a matter of interest Buzz, what is the significance of the word "no" at the end of your posts? Try as I might I can think of no reason for it.
I don't see that my original post. It's possibly a bug in the web interface.
-- Edited by Buzz Lightbulb on Wednesday 1st of June 2022 03:41:29 PM
The "no" in Buzz's post wasn't on my screeen. Just the head shaking emoji.
-- Edited by watsea on Friday 3rd of June 2022 08:22:47 AM