The current situation is an absolute joke, some power crazy state leaders don't want to have their power eroded.
It's time cut the bull carp and release the shackles and let people return to normality, this whole shut something's and other could carry on, was a massive overreaction, a scare campaign was well orchestrated, that turned some people into crazed idiots and others so scared they were afraid to even leave their home to go shopping. If you consider I'm wrong look at our numbers forget the rest of the world, we had less than 0.03% infection rate, more hospital beds needed and deaths occur from road accidents over a similar period. It's time to get Australia off it's arse and get back to work.
Mike Harding said
07:33 AM May 19, 2020
I have some sympathy with your view.
dogbox said
08:03 AM May 19, 2020
the reason we are were we are, is because of the lock down. we have not had the infection rate/deaths that other countries have had because of our over reaction and hope fully the powers to be will start to ease restrictions but not to quickly .
one step at a time as long as the hospitals are coping .the problem would be if the virus got out of control we could be worst off.
think i heard that 48 people are dying daily from heart disease? but the road toll is down
Hendo said
09:55 AM May 19, 2020
"The easing of the restrictions does not mean that the virus is under control, it just means we have beds available in ICU at the moment.
erad said
10:22 AM May 19, 2020
I received this in an email from a friend. it is solid stuff....
"The paragraphs below were written by a nurse who works with ventilators:
Here you go folks... for those people who don't understand what it means to be on a ventilator but want to take the chance of going back to work....
For starters, it's NOT an oxygen mask put over the mouth while the patient is comfortably lying down and reading magazines. Ventilation for COVID-19 is a painful intubation that goes down your throat and stays there until you live or you die.
It is done under anesthesia for 2 to 3 weeks without moving, often upside down, with a tube inserted from the mouth up to the trachea and allows you to breathe to the rhythm of the lung machine.
The patient can't talk or eat, or do anything naturally - the machine keeps you alive.
The discomfort and pain they feel from this means medical experts have to administer sedatives and painkillers to ensure tube tolerance for as long as the machine is needed. It's like being in an artificial coma.
After 20 days from this treatment, a young patient loses 40% muscle mass, and gets mouth or vocal cords trauma, as well as possible pulmonary or heart complications.
It is for this reason that old or already weak people can't withstand the treatment and die. Many of us are in this boat ... so stay safe unless you want to take the chance of ending up here. This is NOT the flu.
Add a tube into your stomach, either through your nose or skin for liquid food, a sticky bag around your butt to collect the diarrhea, a foley to collect urine, an IV for fluids and meds, an A-line to monitor your BP that is completely dependent upon finely calculated med doses, teams of nurses, CRNA's and MA's to reposition your limbs every two hours and lying on a mat that circulates ice cold fluid to help bring down your 104 degree temp.
Anyone want to try all that out?
Then stay home!
Stay safe and well!"
Whenarewethere said
12:31 PM May 19, 2020
UK has had 185 doctors, nurses & medical staff die. Personally I think we should keep them alive.
Disclaimer, my sister is a nurse.
Mike Harding said
03:57 PM May 19, 2020
erad wrote:
I received this in an email from a friend. it is solid stuff....
No it isn't. It's a diatribe intended to stir emotion.
Some supposed missive from a supposed nurse is not a sufficient reason to cause enormous damage to the economies of major nations.
On top of that it totally fails to consider the deaths which have occurred because of imagined effects of C19:
C19 may, or may not, be a significant problem but we should not simply lie down and let governments walk all over us.
Collo said
04:31 PM May 19, 2020
I agree with dogbox. It is too early too open up the country. Small steps at first to make sure the virus doesn't flare up again.
The Federal, State leaders and the general public have done a excellent job of tying this virus down.
WW2 lasted six years.....surely we can suffer a bit of inconvienence for six months.
erad said
04:42 PM May 19, 2020
Mike Harding wrote: "No it isn't. It's a diatribe intended to stir emotion."
Free choice Mike. I am not panicking, but I am certainly not going round wildly socialising either. Right now, I am fully occupied caring for my wife who is recovering from major surgery, so there is no way that I would even consider going out for a drive etc, but hopefully soon I will be able to get her out in the sun and go somewhere for a change of scenery. We are not paranoid about the virus, but we certainly are not slap happy with it either.
Luckily we live in the country where currently we have no virus cases in our town. But we are en route to and from the ski fields, and I am certain there will be a lot of pressure on the Govt to allow the ski season to go ahead. Down come all the yuppies and ski bunnies (including one or two virus cases) and next thing some of the locals will get it too. And then we will all be in lockdown again around here. And some of the older residents (me included ) will then be exposed to the virus where we have missed out so far. And all because the ski field operators will be pressuring the Govt to open the ski fields for the season....
In a strange way, I am glad of the virus because at least we can get from one side of the main street to the other without having to risk life and limb from the ski traffic in winter and the fishing traffic in the summer. Normally, it is a case of cross the street before the June Long weekend, and wait until the October long weekend before we can get back....
-- Edited by erad on Tuesday 19th of May 2020 04:42:54 PM
-- Edited by erad on Tuesday 19th of May 2020 04:47:36 PM
dogbox said
04:42 PM May 19, 2020
if the USA has 10 times the population we have , an they have had 90,000+ deaths would that mean that if it wasn't being managed like it is, would we have 9,000 dead people instead of about 100. i wonder how many on this forum would be among the 9,000 dead. the current situation being the joke that it is !
erad said
04:56 PM May 19, 2020
I am far from favouring our government, but comparing them to the USA government, one person in particular, I think that our system has kept us so much safer than the US. Yes - it is a damned nuisance, yes - our grandchildren will still be paying for all the incentives that have been thrown our way, but yes - our infection and death toll is so much less that other countries, it makes it all worthwhile.
It is worth remembering that the majority of deaths which come from this virus are elderly people, whose ability to resist the virus has been reduced by a number of factors, age being the key one, but also lifestyle and affluence. I have never smoked, yet I have a severe respiratory condition and if the virus hit me, I doubt I would survive it. What price do you put on that?
Greg 1 said
05:27 PM May 19, 2020
I agree. The lockdown is absolutely necessary. WA borders with be the last restriction lifted here and the McGowan government has my full support.
If you think this is some sort of conspiracy you really need some meds.
If the lockdown saves one Australian life it is well worth it and I think it has saved far more than that.
Be patient. It will be over. All of us want to be back on the road and that will happen. But we don't want this thing to get loose which it will do if we go too early.
Gundog said
08:31 PM May 19, 2020
It's not hard to see that a large segment of the population have been conned by the misinformation and over reaction lead by the media claptrap, reality there are big tracts of Australia that have had zero infections of the virus, but have to endure the stupid shutdowns because at it's height of this perceived crisis it was still less than 0.03% infection rate, social distancing and shutdowns were not the reason the infection rate went down. Many hospitals across the nation were almost empty, never seeing a single case, my niece is a nurse in a country hospital, she had to work 12 hour shifts sitting around doing nothing, but being paid 4 hours overtime a day. Truth is the victim of this saga.
Bicyclecamper said
09:40 PM May 19, 2020
It has to stay shut down until they find a cure. They still have not found a cure for Sars - Ten years later, and it is not as deadly as this one. Sars, one day will come back from China, and China as well as many other countries that do not value cleanliness especially around their food hygiene will be the death of all of us, if we let them back into the country. Countries will have to stay shut. Trade can still be done, but no more people leaving their countries ever again. Eventually, they will open the state borders here, but for godsake don't open International borders ever again.
dogbox said
09:46 PM May 19, 2020
i wonder why the country is in good shape is it because of the restrictions ? when this business started the health system was in no state to handle what was coming, now that things are up to speed it would appear we are now prepared for the worst, if it happens. if the lifting restriction let things run a bit wild .
most country towns have no reported cases. would that be because of the restrictions ? probably
will thing get back NORMAL ? what is normal
as stated previously if our leadership had of behaved as some other countries leadership did we could of had possibly 9000 + dead people instead of 100 people who died
i think our country has done well even with the mistakes that were made .
we can see what happens overseas when people don't follow the health warnings (USA) an compare to a country that follows health warnings (Viet Nam) 100,000,000 people no deaths due to corona virus .
as restrictions get eased i hope people don't all rush out an go as far as they can, as fast as they can. as soon as they can , just because they can.
some will ,i for one will be about 3 week behind them if things a looking good and it is deemed safe for older people to out and about.
most country towns will still be lacking medical facilities and any outbreaks would stretch things and cases sent to major centres for treatment
stay safe
landy said
09:56 PM May 19, 2020
Personalty if I had to make a choice between having this virus over controlled or under controlled I would go for over controlled every time.
Izabarack said
04:55 AM May 20, 2020
All the smart people are predicting a Second Wave if the general population does not remain cautious and actively participate in a staged reopening. I am very happy that my State Government is more concerned with saving lives rather than concentrating on some sort of economic recovery.
Iza
mixo said
08:59 AM May 20, 2020
People need to take a chill pill.This is a grey nomads forum.I don't get how a couple of grey nomads in their caravan or campervan visits places in the middle of nowhere is going to make the Covid situation worse. Like as if someone who is at retirement age is going to get covid and start traveling around Australia. They would be lucky to get to the state boarder before they cark it.
Last time I checked most rural areas around Australia had ZERO cases of Covid.
I think its time governments relaxed the rules a little, let the grey nomads loose, get some of these country towns going before families start getting out there(june/july school holidays).
I'm sure everyone out there will be practicing covid safe procedures while traveling.
mixo
P.s Wouldn't it be totally insane if we can travel to NZ and some states still have their border closed?
Wanda said
09:45 AM May 20, 2020
So glad our country, both state and federal, is being run by good, sensible, educated people.
They are listening to the experts, thats "health experts and scientists", not f..x news or some of those redneck disc jockeys on the eastern coast.
I am glad we don't have an "orange idiot" in charge here, but sadly, I can see that "some" people here on this forum would probably prefer that other option.
regards
Ian
dogbox said
10:55 AM May 20, 2020
mixo wrote:
People need to take a chill pill.This is a grey nomads forum.I don't get how a couple of grey nomads in their caravan or campervan visits places in the middle of nowhere is going to make the Covid situation worse. Like as if someone who is at retirement age is going to get covid and start traveling around Australia. They would be lucky to get to the state boarder before they cark it.
Last time I checked most rural areas around Australia had ZERO cases of Covid.
I think its time governments relaxed the rules a little, let the grey nomads loose, get some of these country towns going before families start getting out there(june/july school holidays).
I'm sure everyone out there will be practicing covid safe procedures while traveling.
mixo
P.s Wouldn't it be totally insane if we can travel to NZ and some states still have their border closed?
why do you think most country towns /rural areas have zero cases would it be because of the travel restrictions ? we have the flu season getting started, that usually has it's own toll. covid from what we are told is more contagious and more deadly to those that are susceptible with respiratory issues/ heart issues/diabetes ect the rules are being relaxed just not fast enough for some people . would the people who want the restrictions lifted now, seem to be the same ones who object to sign on to government app because they don't want to be "tracked" well bad news what they are talking about now is that you must record where you have been and who your with if you enter places where contact may occur.
Cupie said
11:06 AM May 20, 2020
Wanda wrote:
So glad our country, both state and federal, is being run by good, sensible, educated people. They are listening to the experts, thats "health experts and scientists", not f..x news or some of those redneck disc jockeys on the eastern coast. I am glad we don't have an "orange idiot" in charge here, but sadly, I can see that "some" people here on this forum would probably prefer that other option. regards Ian
Ian ..
I agree strongly with those who express views similar to yours. I see the USA as a society in decline in that they can elect and in large part continue to support such an incompetent administration.
We aught to keep travel restrictions et. al. in place until the virus is in complete control as determined by the experts/scientists .. not the Economists or the vested interests. BTW I see it as a sign of success that many Hospitals are empty.
It is good that we have a Govt. that in this case choose to listen to the experts/scientists (wouldn't it be great if they would do the same WRT Climate Change), and then implement decisions that put people first. Or at least they have up until now, but I see the cracks appearing as their ideologues begin to push their agenda under the cloud of the focus on Covid 19.
While I would like to welcome the Southeners back to Qld. for winter, filling up the CPs to the extent that as usual the locals can't get a reasonable site, I am just hoping that the Qld Premier holds out long enough for us to winter at Hervey Bay. LOL
Perhaps a "Great Big Lovely Wall" might be the answer, hey. LOL
BTW, I trust our form of voter determined Govt. rather than the Free Market mechanisms of the Capitalist world. I support more Govt. regulation, not less.
Santa said
11:40 AM May 20, 2020
Australian leaders have done well in controlling the virus.
People who deem the isolation and shut down measures taken as pointless need to have a think about why we have escaped so lightly (to this point) could it be that the actions taken by our state and federal governments are the reason? surely not!
msg said
01:17 PM May 20, 2020
Well, we couldn't have all those people chucked out of their jobs having fun (on the public purse) when the frontline workers were risking life and limb. Thus they had to close everything down. Including pastimes like camping, fishing boating and golfing where there was little chance of breaking social distancing rules.... just saying. Clamp down - necessary but so much?
-- Edited by msg on Wednesday 20th of May 2020 01:19:19 PM
bgt said
01:45 PM May 20, 2020
Everyone needs to keep everything in perspective. Yes there have been 100 sad deaths. Yes we need to be very careful with any outbreaks. But at what cost? It's so easy for us retired folks to say we want the lockdown to continue. But the lockdown is destroying lives. Financial and health wise. Folks are going bankrupt. Unemployment is having a huge mental told on the country. Suicides will, according to recent reports, go up by 400%. So at what point do we go back to 'normal'? 0 infections? 20 infections? 50 or 100? Who gets to decide what is acceptable?
A vaccine may be a year or two away. So do we stay in lockdown until then? Or do we learn to live with covid-19? At some point we have to make a decision and make the calculated risk of virus v getting back to life. So who here wants to make that decision?
Izabarack said
02:41 PM May 20, 2020
bgt wrote:
Yes there have been 100 sad deaths.
Or do we learn to live with covid-19?
6 deaths in Qld. Mostly quite old folk and nearly all from a Cruise Ship infection site. Along comes the lockdown and no more deaths. Zero new cases reported most days. Is the lockdown working? Yes is the correct answer. I have no intention of learning to live with Covid-19. The right way ahead is pretty clear and the responsible authorities have it right as shown by the results.
The contrast to be recognised is in the 1000% increases in cases reported in places in the USA where the Numpties are ignoring pro-social behaviours in favour of close contact as an expression of their individual rights. I notice these fools are dismissive of those who also have the right and desire to avoid infection.
Iza
dogbox said
02:42 PM May 20, 2020
bgt wrote:
Everyone needs to keep everything in perspective. Yes there have been 100 sad deaths. Yes we need to be very careful with any outbreaks. But at what cost? It's so easy for us retired folks to say we want the lockdown to continue. But the lockdown is destroying lives. Financial and health wise. Folks are going bankrupt. Unemployment is having a huge mental told on the country. Suicides will, according to recent reports, go up by 400%. So at what point do we go back to 'normal'? 0 infections? 20 infections? 50 or 100? Who gets to decide what is acceptable? A vaccine may be a year or two away. So do we stay in lockdown until then? Or do we learn to live with covid-19? At some point we have to make a decision and make the calculated risk of virus v getting back to life. So who here wants to make that decision?
as i look at it restrictions should be be eased every 2-3 weeks if our hospital system is coping ease a few more restrictions, to quick an we run the risk of having to take steps backwards the old are at greatest risk but there are a lot of young healthy people who are being affected badly
where would you rather be in Australia, the UK or USA
a vaccine is to far away to help us at the moment
as far as who gets to decide what is acceptable that would be an easier decision than who gets the respirator
Tony Bev said
02:51 PM May 20, 2020
My opinion is
I do not know enough about this Coronavirus, to predict, what is the best for me/Western Australia/Australia/World, so I will follow the advice, of the medical people
Looking at the best and worst scenario, world wide
Best = Taiwan. This country was geared up for a Sars epidemic, as they had been through that scenario, a few years earlier They quickly locked down As of 20 May 2020. Coronavirus cases 440, deaths 7 (0.3 deaths per million of population)
Worst = United States of America. For whatever reason, which has nothing to do with me, they were very slow to lockdown They appeared (to me), to have placed economy before health. As of 20 May 2020. Coronavirus cases 1,570,583 deaths 93,533 (283 deaths per million of population)
I had already agreed with myself, (long before Coronavirus) that my health, will always come before my wealth
Usual disclaimer, that as I am in my 70's, I doubt if any boss, would be silly enough to employ me, in the future
I therefore support the lockdowns, until the medical (and not the economic) people, give the all clear
Copy and paste to what the WA premier said, a few hours after I posted my original opinion
WA Premier Mark McGowan has hit back at calls from the New South Wales and Federal governments for interstate borders to be reopened, saying he will not be "bullied" by a state that allowed the Ruby Princess disaster to unfold. NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian has claimed states keeping their borders closed were "hindering" the nation's economic recovery. Mr McGowan said the WA border would remain closed for months to come and questioned whether NSW was in any position to be handing out advice
-- Edited by Tony Bev on Wednesday 20th of May 2020 02:54:21 PM
-- Edited by Tony Bev on Wednesday 20th of May 2020 04:35:32 PM
bgt said
04:38 PM May 20, 2020
All the 'expert's' agree that covid-19 will be with us for many years. Even with a vaccine. So unless we go into a permanent lockdown we have no choice but to learn to live with it. Just as we have learnt to live with the flue and many many other deadly diseases.
The question is "what level of infection is acceptable?"
Izabarack said
05:30 PM May 20, 2020
Tony Bev wrote:
Best = Taiwan.
It seems Vietnam might beat that. Zero deaths. But then Vietnam imposed lockdowns in January. Smart people those Vietnamese.
I have some sympathy with your view.
one step at a time as long as the hospitals are coping .the problem would be if the virus got out of control we could be worst off.
think i heard that 48 people are dying daily from heart disease? but the road toll is down
"The paragraphs below were written by a nurse who works with ventilators:
Here you go folks... for those people who don't understand what it means to be on a ventilator but want to take the chance of going back to work....
For starters, it's NOT an oxygen mask put over the mouth while the patient is comfortably lying down and reading magazines. Ventilation for COVID-19 is a painful intubation that goes down your throat and stays there until you live or you die.
It is done under anesthesia for 2 to 3 weeks without moving, often upside down, with a tube inserted from the mouth up to the trachea and allows you to breathe to the rhythm of the lung machine.
The patient can't talk or eat, or do anything naturally - the machine keeps you alive.
The discomfort and pain they feel from this means medical experts have to administer sedatives and painkillers to ensure tube tolerance for as long as the machine is needed. It's like being in an artificial coma.
After 20 days from this treatment, a young patient loses 40% muscle mass, and gets mouth or vocal cords trauma, as well as possible pulmonary or heart complications.
It is for this reason that old or already weak people can't withstand the treatment and die. Many of us are in this boat ... so stay safe unless you want to take the chance of ending up here. This is NOT the flu.
Add a tube into your stomach, either through your nose or skin for liquid food, a sticky bag around your butt to collect the diarrhea, a foley to collect urine, an IV for fluids and meds, an A-line to monitor your BP that is completely dependent upon finely calculated med doses, teams of nurses, CRNA's and MA's to reposition your limbs every two hours and lying on a mat that circulates ice cold fluid to help bring down your 104 degree temp.
Anyone want to try all that out?
Then stay home!
Stay safe and well!"
UK has had 185 doctors, nurses & medical staff die. Personally I think we should keep them alive.
Disclaimer, my sister is a nurse.
No it isn't. It's a diatribe intended to stir emotion.
Some supposed missive from a supposed nurse is not a sufficient reason to cause enormous damage to the economies of major nations.
On top of that it totally fails to consider the deaths which have occurred because of imagined effects of C19:
https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/05/15/we-could-open-up-again-and-forget-the-whole-thing/
C19 may, or may not, be a significant problem but we should not simply lie down and let governments walk all over us.
I agree with dogbox. It is too early too open up the country. Small steps at first to make sure the virus doesn't flare up again.
The Federal, State leaders and the general public have done a excellent job of tying this virus down.
WW2 lasted six years.....surely we can suffer a bit of inconvienence for six months.
Mike Harding wrote: "No it isn't. It's a diatribe intended to stir emotion."
Free choice Mike. I am not panicking, but I am certainly not going round wildly socialising either. Right now, I am fully occupied caring for my wife who is recovering from major surgery, so there is no way that I would even consider going out for a drive etc, but hopefully soon I will be able to get her out in the sun and go somewhere for a change of scenery. We are not paranoid about the virus, but we certainly are not slap happy with it either.
Luckily we live in the country where currently we have no virus cases in our town. But we are en route to and from the ski fields, and I am certain there will be a lot of pressure on the Govt to allow the ski season to go ahead. Down come all the yuppies and ski bunnies (including one or two virus cases) and next thing some of the locals will get it too. And then we will all be in lockdown again around here. And some of the older residents (me included ) will then be exposed to the virus where we have missed out so far. And all because the ski field operators will be pressuring the Govt to open the ski fields for the season....
In a strange way, I am glad of the virus because at least we can get from one side of the main street to the other without having to risk life and limb from the ski traffic in winter and the fishing traffic in the summer. Normally, it is a case of cross the street before the June Long weekend, and wait until the October long weekend before we can get back....
-- Edited by erad on Tuesday 19th of May 2020 04:42:54 PM
-- Edited by erad on Tuesday 19th of May 2020 04:47:36 PM
I am far from favouring our government, but comparing them to the USA government, one person in particular, I think that our system has kept us so much safer than the US. Yes - it is a damned nuisance, yes - our grandchildren will still be paying for all the incentives that have been thrown our way, but yes - our infection and death toll is so much less that other countries, it makes it all worthwhile.
It is worth remembering that the majority of deaths which come from this virus are elderly people, whose ability to resist the virus has been reduced by a number of factors, age being the key one, but also lifestyle and affluence. I have never smoked, yet I have a severe respiratory condition and if the virus hit me, I doubt I would survive it. What price do you put on that?
most country towns have no reported cases. would that be because of the restrictions ? probably
will thing get back NORMAL ? what is normal
as stated previously if our leadership had of behaved as some other countries leadership did we could of had possibly 9000 + dead people instead of 100 people who died
i think our country has done well even with the mistakes that were made .
we can see what happens overseas when people don't follow the health warnings (USA) an compare to a country that follows health warnings (Viet Nam) 100,000,000 people no deaths due to corona virus .
as restrictions get eased i hope people don't all rush out an go as far as they can, as fast as they can. as soon as they can , just because they can.
some will ,i for one will be about 3 week behind them if things a looking good and it is deemed safe for older people to out and about.
most country towns will still be lacking medical facilities and any outbreaks would stretch things and cases sent to major centres for treatment
stay safe
Iza
Last time I checked most rural areas around Australia had ZERO cases of Covid.
I think its time governments relaxed the rules a little, let the grey nomads loose, get some of these country towns going before families start getting out there(june/july school holidays).
I'm sure everyone out there will be practicing covid safe procedures while traveling.
mixo
P.s Wouldn't it be totally insane if we can travel to NZ and some states still have their border closed?
They are listening to the experts, thats "health experts and scientists", not f..x news or some of those redneck disc jockeys on the eastern coast.
I am glad we don't have an "orange idiot" in charge here, but sadly, I can see that "some" people here on this forum would probably prefer that other option.
regards
Ian
why do you think most country towns /rural areas have zero cases would it be because of the travel restrictions ?
we have the flu season getting started, that usually has it's own toll.
covid from what we are told is more contagious and more deadly to those that are susceptible with respiratory issues/ heart issues/diabetes ect
the rules are being relaxed just not fast enough for some people .
would the people who want the restrictions lifted now, seem to be the same ones who object to sign on to government app because they don't want to be "tracked" well bad news what they are talking about now is that you must record where you have been and who your with if you enter places where contact may occur.
Ian ..
I agree strongly with those who express views similar to yours. I see the USA as a society in decline in that they can elect and in large part continue to support such an incompetent administration.
We aught to keep travel restrictions et. al. in place until the virus is in complete control as determined by the experts/scientists .. not the Economists or the vested interests. BTW I see it as a sign of success that many Hospitals are empty.
It is good that we have a Govt. that in this case choose to listen to the experts/scientists (wouldn't it be great if they would do the same WRT Climate Change), and then implement decisions that put people first. Or at least they have up until now, but I see the cracks appearing as their ideologues begin to push their agenda under the cloud of the focus on Covid 19.
While I would like to welcome the Southeners back to Qld. for winter, filling up the CPs to the extent that as usual the locals can't get a reasonable site, I am just hoping that the Qld Premier holds out long enough for us to winter at Hervey Bay. LOL
Perhaps a "Great Big Lovely Wall" might be the answer, hey. LOL
BTW, I trust our form of voter determined Govt. rather than the Free Market mechanisms of the Capitalist world. I support more Govt. regulation, not less.
Australian leaders have done well in controlling the virus.
People who deem the isolation and shut down measures taken as pointless need to have a think about why we have escaped so lightly (to this point) could it be that the actions taken by our state and federal governments are the reason? surely not!
Well, we couldn't have all those people chucked out of their jobs having fun (on the public purse) when the frontline workers were risking life and limb. Thus they had to close everything down. Including pastimes like camping, fishing boating and golfing where there was little chance of breaking social distancing rules.... just saying. Clamp down - necessary but so much?
-- Edited by msg on Wednesday 20th of May 2020 01:19:19 PM
6 deaths in Qld. Mostly quite old folk and nearly all from a Cruise Ship infection site. Along comes the lockdown and no more deaths. Zero new cases reported most days. Is the lockdown working? Yes is the correct answer. I have no intention of learning to live with Covid-19. The right way ahead is pretty clear and the responsible authorities have it right as shown by the results.
The contrast to be recognised is in the 1000% increases in cases reported in places in the USA where the Numpties are ignoring pro-social behaviours in favour of close contact as an expression of their individual rights. I notice these fools are dismissive of those who also have the right and desire to avoid infection.
Iza
as i look at it restrictions should be be eased every 2-3 weeks if our hospital system is coping ease a few more restrictions, to quick an we run the risk of having to take steps backwards the old are at greatest risk but there are a lot of young healthy people who are being affected badly
where would you rather be in Australia, the UK or USA
a vaccine is to far away to help us at the moment
as far as who gets to decide what is acceptable that would be an easier decision than who gets the respirator
My opinion is
I do not know enough about this Coronavirus, to predict, what is the best for me/Western Australia/Australia/World, so I will follow the advice, of the medical people
Looking at the best and worst scenario, world wide
Best = Taiwan. This country was geared up for a Sars epidemic, as they had been through that scenario, a few years earlier
They quickly locked down
As of 20 May 2020. Coronavirus cases 440, deaths 7 (0.3 deaths per million of population)
Worst = United States of America. For whatever reason, which has nothing to do with me, they were very slow to lockdown
They appeared (to me), to have placed economy before health.
As of 20 May 2020. Coronavirus cases 1,570,583 deaths 93,533 (283 deaths per million of population)
Link for the above information, is below
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
I had already agreed with myself, (long before Coronavirus) that my health, will always come before my wealth
Usual disclaimer, that as I am in my 70's, I doubt if any boss, would be silly enough to employ me, in the future
I therefore support the lockdowns, until the medical (and not the economic) people, give the all clear
Copy and paste to what the WA premier said, a few hours after I posted my original opinion
-- Edited by Tony Bev on Wednesday 20th of May 2020 02:54:21 PM
-- Edited by Tony Bev on Wednesday 20th of May 2020 04:35:32 PM
It seems Vietnam might beat that. Zero deaths. But then Vietnam imposed lockdowns in January. Smart people those Vietnamese.
Iza
Grandparents