Quite often I wonder if good intentioned folk only read the original post and then decide to provide comment/advice, simply click Reply and provide their advice/information/comment without reading all the 'reply posts' that are already on the thread.
So often the question gets answered with the same information repeatedly from various posters.
Makes sense to read all the posts on a thread before putting finger to keyboard praps.
Just makes me wonder
Cheers - John
aussie_paul said
04:08 PM May 1, 2014
rockylizard wrote:
Gday...
Quite often I wonder if good intentioned folk only read the original post and then decide to provide comment/advice, simply click Reply and provide their advice/information/comment without reading all the 'reply posts' that are already on the thread.
So often the question gets answered with the same information repeatedly from various posters.
Makes sense to read all the posts on a thread before putting finger to keyboard praps.
Just makes me wonder
Cheers - John
Me too John, although I have been guilty!!!
Aussie Paul.
NeilandRaine said
05:43 PM May 1, 2014
This is a dilemma, but my answer is............. Me too John, although I have been guilty.
hako said
05:47 PM May 1, 2014
Sometimes it may be required, like to reinforce a point of view. This thread is a perfect example...think about it.
GaryKelly said
05:52 PM May 1, 2014
Yeah... it's kinda like someone interrupting you with their opinion before you've finished what ya wanna say. Grrrrrr.
Gday...
Quite often I wonder if good intentioned folk only read the original post and then decide to provide comment/advice, simply click Reply and provide their advice/information/comment without reading all the 'reply posts' that are already on the thread.
So often the question gets answered with the same information repeatedly from various posters.
Makes sense to read all the posts on a thread before putting finger to keyboard praps.
Just makes me wonder
Cheers - John
Me too John, although I have been guilty!!!
Aussie Paul.