what about AKS -ask. unexperienced - inexperienced then all the ABC announcers who say - a historical instead of an..... don't get me started Aussies go on about our 'fush n chups' but if I hear
flarg, barg, harpen, thart, flart and all the other lazy 'a ' sounds......
-- Edited by spida on Thursday 24th of October 2013 08:50:00 PM
rockylizard said
02:33 AM Oct 25, 2013
GaryKelly said
04:04 AM Oct 25, 2013
One foul swoop instead of one fell swoop is another. And I'm surprised by the number of people, including pollies and journalists, who use where've instead of we've and there've instead of they've.
Mobi Condo said
08:40 PM Oct 25, 2013
I definately - oops definitely - agree!
And what's more the forum site spell checker is making it hard for me to post the error spelling!
-- Edited by Mobi Condo on Friday 25th of October 2013 08:42:12 PM
NeilandRaine said
12:15 AM Oct 26, 2013
Speaking of, I just watched a religious order playing stringed instruments; theres too much sects and violins on TV these days.
The dog lady said
12:33 AM Oct 26, 2013
GaryKelly wrote:
One foul swoop instead of one fell swoop is another. And I'm surprised by the number of people, including pollies and journalists, who use where've instead of we've and there've instead of they've.
If you're going to relate it to pollies then "one foul swoop" may be more appropriate, or perhaps many foul swoops
johnq said
07:53 PM Oct 26, 2013
Being in agreeance.
For all intensive purposes.
Confusing thing and think.
A duel utility.
'Literally', almost every time it is used.
The dog lady said
12:56 AM Oct 27, 2013
johnq wrote:
Being in agreeance.
For all intensive purposes.
Confusing thing and think.
A duel utility.
'Literally', almost every time it is used.
I think in pictures.........everytime I see ''duel cab ute'' I picture landcruiser tray backs with pistols at 20 paces
Baz421 said
04:57 AM Oct 27, 2013
et al,,,
gets a lot of people
countryroad said
06:58 AM Oct 28, 2013
what about your instead of you're
Keith19837 said
08:36 PM Oct 28, 2013
S.W.M.B.O. is half Welsh and half Maltese, she also spent a few years in Germany. I do not DARE pick her up on the various pronounciations and enunciations that she uses. I generally gauge the tone of her voice and, hopefully, I respond accordingly. However this is not always an accurate reading of her requests nor does she always get the reply she wants. I find myself getting up off the floor a lot.
what about AKS -ask.
don't get me started
but if I hear
unexperienced - inexperienced
then all the ABC announcers who say - a historical instead of an.....
Aussies go on about our 'fush n chups'
flarg, barg, harpen, thart, flart and all the other lazy 'a ' sounds......
-- Edited by spida on Thursday 24th of October 2013 08:50:00 PM
I definately - oops definitely - agree!
And what's more the forum site spell checker is making it hard for me to post the error spelling!
-- Edited by Mobi Condo on Friday 25th of October 2013 08:42:12 PM
If you're going to relate it to pollies then "one foul swoop" may be more appropriate, or perhaps many foul swoops
For all intensive purposes.
Confusing thing and think.
A duel utility.
'Literally', almost every time it is used.
I think in pictures.........everytime I see ''duel cab ute'' I picture landcruiser tray backs with pistols at 20 paces
et al,,,
gets a lot of people
S.W.M.B.O. is half Welsh and half Maltese, she also spent a few years in Germany. I do not DARE pick her up on the various pronounciations and enunciations that she uses. I generally gauge the tone of her voice and, hopefully, I respond accordingly. However this is not always an accurate reading of her requests nor does she always get the reply she wants. I find myself getting up off the floor a lot.