I'm glad you approve John. I'll never remember all that anyway, but I thought it very apt.
By the way, at the risk of sounding dumb, that little face, what does the xd stand for?
At the risk of stirring the grammar police again...
Gday...
Excellent ... I've pinched that for further distribution
It reminds me of my father's constant direction - "If I've told you once, I've told you a million times - don't exagerate!"
Cheers - John
I have no idea really .... but looking at the 'icon' it may mean that the eyes are "X'ed" out - praps - therefore xd = exxed
cheers - John
rockylizard wrote:Gday...I have no idea really .... but looking at the 'icon' it may mean that the eyes are "X'ed" out - praps - therefore xd = exxed cheers - John
Yes, that seems likely. I've never used that one before but I like it.
Beth54 wrote: By the way, at the risk of sounding dumb, that little face, what does the xd stand for? -- Edited by Beth54 on Monday 7th of January 2013 06:50:25 PM
-- Edited by Beth54 on Monday 7th of January 2013 06:50:25 PM
Morning Beth, how about cross eyed.
Yep ... makes sense santa
Yep, does make sense.
sandsmere wrote:Very good Beth , but I don't need it .cos I got lernt how to tork propa at skool . I can spel good two
Very good Beth , but I don't need it .
cos I got lernt how to tork propa at skool . I can spel good two
cos I got lernt how to tork propa at skool . I can spel good two .
sandsmere wrote:Very good Beth , but I don't need it .cos I got lernt how to tork propa at skool . I can spel good two .
I can see that!
spida wrote:XD - an expletive usually. In capitals a strong one :)
XD - an expletive usually. In capitals a strong one :)
Oh! In that case maybe I won't use it!
Well ... I'll be
Beth54 wrote:At the risk of stirring the grammar police again...
Running foul of the grammar gestapo is bad enough but worse still are the comma coppers and the apostrophe apologists!
(edit: another bloody typo!)
jimricho wrote:Beth54 wrote:At the risk of stirring the grammar police again... Running foul of the grammar gestapo is bad enough but worse still are the comma coppers and the apostrophe apologists!(edit: another bloody typo!)-- Edited by jimricho on Saturday 12th of January 2013 08:13:39 PM
-- Edited by jimricho on Saturday 12th of January 2013 08:13:39 PM
I'm glad you approve John.
I'll never remember all that anyway, but I thought it very apt.
By the way, at the risk of sounding dumb, that little
face, what does the xd stand for? 
-- Edited by Beth54 on Monday 7th of January 2013 06:50:25 PM
At the risk of stirring the grammar police again...
Gday...
It reminds me of my father's constant direction - "If I've told you once, I've told you a million times - don't exagerate!"
Cheers - John
Gday...
I have no idea really .... but looking at the 'icon' it may mean that the eyes are "X'ed" out - praps - therefore xd = exxed
cheers - John
Yes, that seems likely. I've never used that one before but I like it.
Morning Beth, how about cross eyed.
Gday...
Yep ... makes sense santa
Cheers - John
Yep, does make sense.
-- Edited by ibbo on Thursday 10th of January 2013 07:12:22 AM
Very good Beth , but I don't need it .
cos I got lernt how to tork propa at skool . I can spel good two .
Oh!
In that case maybe I won't use it! 
Gday...
Well
... I'll be 
cheers - John
Running foul of the grammar gestapo is bad enough but worse still are the comma coppers and the apostrophe apologists!
(edit: another bloody typo!)
-- Edited by jimricho on Saturday 12th of January 2013 08:13:39 PM