Unusual post Santa, who said anything about tattoo removal at public expense?
Santa said
09:18 PM Feb 19, 2016
An observation on my part in reply to Felicia's post Troopy, the title of the forum is, I Digress.
03_Troopy said
01:28 AM Feb 20, 2016
Digressed almost off the page LOL
Phillipn said
06:50 AM Feb 20, 2016
dorian wrote:
Yesterday I was sitting in my doctor's waiting room and I was surrounded by people with tattoos. One guy, probably in his 40s, had grotesque tattoos all over his arms, legs, torso and head. I doubt that there would have been any area of skin that hadn't been mutilated.
Another woman, also in her 40s, had tattoos covering both her arms, from hand to shoulder. I was on the verge of retching when another woman, in her late 20s or early 30s, sat directly opposite me. She also had full length tattoos on her arms, plus some on her neck and chest. She had piercings along the length of her ear and studs in her nose and eyebrow. Her fingers and toes were covered in fading black nail polish. She had a can of Red Bull which she sipped through a straw every 2 or 3 minutes. It seemed like she was on a caffeine drip.
I left the surgery sicker than when I arrived.
-- Edited by dorian on Saturday 9th of January 2016 07:03:19 AM
Checking out the young ladies chest eh! Was it nice.
dorian said
07:48 AM Feb 20, 2016
Checking out the young ladies chest eh! Was it nice.
No, she was fat and ugly, but I was too polite to tell her.
wauri said
08:24 AM Feb 20, 2016
To put the MRI myth to bed, I have a few tattoos and recently had an MRI on my neck
My chest and arms didnt get pulled into the machine
So I think that one is done and dusted
The Phantom said
09:41 AM Feb 20, 2016
dorian wrote:
Checking out the young ladies chest eh! Was it nice.
No, she was fat and ugly, but I was too polite to tell her.
It seems to be the fat and ugly ones with the tattoos. There is some sort of belief that it enhances their looks.
Wrong!!!
The Phantom
03_Troopy said
02:03 PM Feb 20, 2016
The Phantom wrote:
dorian wrote:
Checking out the young ladies chest eh! Was it nice.
No, she was fat and ugly, but I was too polite to tell her.
It seems to be the fat and ugly ones with the tattoos. There is some sort of belief that it enhances their looks.
Wrong!!!
The Phantom
Do you think they should wear a disguise instead?
Oh, hangon... that looks a little... bit... like..........
Umm never mind......
Phillipn said
03:05 PM Feb 20, 2016
dorian wrote:
Yesterday I was sitting in my doctor's waiting room and I was surrounded by people with tattoos. One guy, probably in his 40s, had grotesque tattoos all over his arms, legs, torso and head. I doubt that there would have been any area of skin that hadn't been mutilated.
Another woman, also in her 40s, had tattoos covering both her arms, from hand to shoulder. I was on the verge of retching when another woman, in her late 20s or early 30s, sat directly opposite me. She also had full length tattoos on her arms, plus some on her neck and chest. She had piercings along the length of her ear and studs in her nose and eyebrow. Her fingers and toes were covered in fading black nail polish. She had a can of Red Bull which she sipped through a straw every 2 or 3 minutes. It seemed like she was on a caffeine drip.
I left the surgery sicker than when I arrived.
-- Edited by dorian on Saturday 9th of January 2016 07:03:19 AM
No charge to look.
-- Edited by Phillipn on Saturday 20th of February 2016 03:09:48 PM
-- Edited by Phillipn on Saturday 20th of February 2016 03:11:54 PM
dorian said
03:46 PM Feb 20, 2016
Just in case it wasn't obvious, my "ugly" comment was meant to be sarcastic. In this particular thread we are not judging people on the basis of how they look (eg big nose, crooked teeth, birthmark), but on the manner in which they choose to present themselves (eg green hair, Botox, breast implants, tattoos). AISI, if you choose to mutilate yourself in the name of fashion, then that makes you fair game.
Santa said
06:44 PM Feb 20, 2016
dorian wrote:
Just in case it wasn't obvious, my "ugly" comment was meant to be sarcastic. In this particular thread we are not judging people on the basis of how they look (eg big nose, crooked teeth, birthmark), but on the manner in which they choose to present themselves (eg green hair, Botox, breast implants, tattoos). AISI, if you choose to mutilate yourself in the name of fashion, then that makes you fair game.
Well said Dorian.
I was feeling somewhat disturbed at the denigrating remarks re peoples, natural physical attributes.
However as you say, self mutilation is another matter entirely.
03_Troopy said
08:31 AM Feb 21, 2016
I'm still wondering about the woman in the pics disguise...
I don't have any but I agree with you.
The Mythbusters busted that one
Lynda
Very true, however don't expect the Aussie tax payer to pick up the bill, when, in later life you realise what you put on your body was a big mistake.
The cost and pain involved will be firmly in your court.
http://www.xojane.com/healthy/tattoo-removal-pain-cost
An observation on my part in reply to Felicia's post Troopy, the title of the forum is, I Digress.
Digressed almost off the page LOL
Checking out the young ladies chest eh! Was it nice.
No, she was fat and ugly, but I was too polite to tell her.
My chest and arms didnt get pulled into the machine
So I think that one is done and dusted
It seems to be the fat and ugly ones with the tattoos. There is some sort of belief that it enhances their looks.
Wrong!!!
The Phantom
Do you think they should wear a disguise instead?
Oh, hangon... that looks a little... bit... like..........
Umm never mind......
No charge to look.
-- Edited by Phillipn on Saturday 20th of February 2016 03:09:48 PM
-- Edited by Phillipn on Saturday 20th of February 2016 03:11:54 PM
Well said Dorian.
I was feeling somewhat disturbed at the denigrating remarks re peoples, natural physical attributes.
However as you say, self mutilation is another matter entirely.